WZWen Zhuo

Wen Zhuo

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Wen Zhuo has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Hualong Liu

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China

    1 shared publication
  • Kui Hong

    Department of Medical Genetics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China

    1 shared publication
  • Linghua Fu

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

    1 shared publication
  • Weiguo Fan

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Effect of Digitalis on ICD or CRT-D Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    by Wen Zhuo, Hualong Liu, Linghua Fu, Weiguo Fan, Kui Hong

    Background: Digitalis has been widely utilized for heart failure therapy and several studies have demonstrated an association of digitalis and adverse outcome events in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients. Methods: We systematically retrieved relevant studies using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database. A random effect model was used to pool the effect estimates (hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) when the studies were of high heterogeneity, otherwise a fixed effect model was used. Results: Twenty-one articles containing 44,761 ICD or CRT-D recipients were included. Digitalis was associated with an increased rate of appropriate shocks (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.46–1.86, p < 0.001) and a shortened time to first appropriate shock (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.17–2.65, p = 0.007) in ICD or CRT-D recipients. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality increased in ICD recipients with digitalis therapy (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.34–2.16, p < 0.01), but the all-cause mortality was unchanged in CRT-D recipients (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.92–2.60, p = 0.10) or patients who received ICD or CRT-D therapy (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.80–1.48, p = 0.20). The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: ICD recipients with digitalis therapy may tend to have higher mortality rates, but digitalis may not be associated with the mortality rate of CRT-D recipients. Further studies are required to confirm the effects of digitalis on ICD or CRT-D recipients.