Cameron Whilter

Cameron Whilter

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Cameron Whilter has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Balloon-Assisted Thrombin Injection of a Profunda Femoral Pseudoaneurysm Using Radial Access

    by Medhat Chowdhury, Cameron Whilter, Phanindra Antharam, Pritham Reddy, Herman Kado, Matthew Osher

    The profunda femoral artery is an uncommon location for a pseudoaneurysm and is technically challenging to resolve with traditional techniques, such as ultrasound-guided compression or thrombin injection, owing to its deep anatomical location. Balloon-assisted thrombin injection (BATI) is a technique that has been shown to be effective using contralateral access for technically difficult pseudoaneurysms in high-risk surgical patients. We report a case of BATI using radial access in a patient with a profunda femoral artery pseudoaneurysm.


  • Open Access

    Improved left atrial appendage closure procedural efficiency using radiofrequency transseptal wire system

    by Cameron Whitler, Brittni McClellan, Harshil Patel, Dhruv Rajpurohit, Frank Kalaba, Herman Kado, Shukri David, Dipak Shah

    Objective: The radiofrequency (RF) needle has been shown to improve transseptal puncture efficiency and safety compared to mechanical needles. This study aimed to investigate the use of VersaCross RF transseptal wire system (Baylis Medical) to improve procedural efficiency of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) compared to the standard RF needle‐based workflow.Methods: Eighty‐one LAAC procedures using WATCHMAN FLX were retrospectively analyzed comparing the standard RF needle‐based workflow to a RF wire‐based workflow. Study primary endpoint was time to WATCHMAN device release, and secondary endpoints were transseptal puncture time, LAAC success, fluoroscopy use, and procedural complications.Results: Twenty‐five cases using standard RF needle‐based workflow were compared to 56 cases using the RF wire‐based workflow. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between both groups. LAAC was successful in all patients with no differences in intraprocedural complication rates (p = 0.40). Transseptal puncture time was 1.3 min faster using the RF wire‐based workflow compared to the standard RF needle‐based workflow (6.5 ± 2.3 vs. 7.8 ± 2.3 min, p = 0.02). Overall, time to final WATCHMAN device release was 4.5 min faster with the RF wire‐based workflow compared to the RF needle‐based workflow (24.6 ± 5.6 vs. 29.1 ± 9.6 min, p = 0.01). Fluoroscopy time was 21% lower using the RF wire‐based workflow (7.6 ± 2.8 vs. 9.6 ± 4.4 min; p = 0.05) and fluoroscopy dose was 67% lower (47.1 ± 35.3 vs. 144.9 ± 156.9 mGy, p = 0.04) and more consistent (F‐test, p ˂ 0.0001).Conclusions: The RF wire‐based workflow streamlines LAAC procedures, improving LAAC efficiency and safety by reducing fluoroscopy, device exchanges, and delivery sheath manipulation.