Anna Ralston

Background: Cellulitis is a common bacterial skin infection usually requiring antibiotic treatment. Accurate diagnosis and management are crucial for patient prognosis and antibiotic stewardship. Phenoxymethylpenicillin is usually the recommended first‐line antibiotic for suspected streptococcal nonpurulent cellulitis. This study investigated antibiotic prescribing patterns and temporal trends for new diagnoses of cellulitis by Australian general practice registrars (speciality trainees in general practice [family medicine]). Methods: Analyses of the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study utilised registrars’ 2010–2021 consultation data involving new diagnoses of cellulitis. The proportion of consultations involving the prescription of antibiotics was calculated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression examined longitudinal changes in the prescription of the two most prescribed antibiotics (cefalexin vs. flucloxacillin/dicloxacillin), adjusted for patient, registrar, practice and consultation factors. Results: A total of 3852 registrars provided data. Of 2708 new diagnoses of cellulitis, flucloxacillin/dicloxacillin was most commonly prescribed ( n = 1209; 43.6% [95% CI: 41.8, 45.5), followed by cefalexin ( n = 1191; 43.0% [95% CI: 41.1, 44.9]). Phenoxymethylpenicillin was prescribed in 0.6% of cases [95% CI: 0.3, 0.9]. Cephalexin prescription relative to flucloxacillin/dicloxacillin did not change over the 12‐year period (OR 0.99 per year [95% CI: 0.96, 1.03]). Prescription of cefalexin, compared to flucloxacillin/dicloxacillin, was associated with (compared to the age group 25–44 years) ages less than 5 years (OR 2.75 [95% CI: 1.70, 4.43], 5–14 (OR 2.51 [95% CI: 1.63, 3.89]) and 65 years and older (OR 1.51 [95% CI: 1.15, 1.99]). Cefalexin prescription was less likely when registrars sought in‐consultation information from ‘Therapeutic Guidelines (Antibiotic)’ guidelines (OR 0.58 [95% CI: 0.43, 0.80]), supervisors (OR 0.69 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.94]) or other sources (OR 0.64 [95% CI: 0.43, 0.96]). Conclusions: Phenoxymethylpenicillin was prescribed in only 0.6% of presentations, whereas cefalexin and flucloxacillin/dicloxacillin accounted for over 86% of prescriptions. This may reflect a lack of guideline specificity regarding first‐line treatment options and/or registrars’ aetiological diagnostic uncertainty. Prescribing patterns remained relatively stable over time.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat. Australia has high antibiotic prescribing rates with the majority of antibiotics prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) for self-limiting acute respiratory tract infection (ARTIs). Australian GP trainees’ (registrars’) prescribing for ARTIs may have been affected by the introduction of remunerated telehealth consultations in 2020. Understanding of the impact of telehealth on antibiotic stewardship may inform registrar educational programs. Objective: This study aimed to compare the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing by GP registrars in telehealth versus face-to-face (F2F) consultations for common cold (upper respiratory tract infection [URTI]), bronchitis, sore throat, acute otitis media, and sinusitis. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, a multicenter inception cohort study of registrars’ in-consultation clinical and educational experiences. Analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression using 2020-2023 ReCEnT data. The outcome variable was “antibiotic prescribed” for new presentations of URTI, acute sore throat, acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis, and acute otitis media. The study factor was consultation type (telehealth or F2F). Results: A total of 2392 registrars participated (response rate=93.4%). The proportions of diagnoses that were managed via telehealth were 25% (5283/21384) overall, 19% (641/3327) for acute sore throat, 29% (3733/12773) for URTI, 21% (364/1772), for acute bronchitis, 4.1% (72/1758) for acute otitis media, and 27% (473/1754) for acute sinusitis. Antibiotics were prescribed for 51% (1685/3327) of sore throat diagnoses, 6.9% (880/12773) of URTI diagnoses, 64% (1140/1772) of bronchitis diagnoses, 61% (1067/1754) of sinusitis diagnoses, and 73% (1278/1758) of otitis media diagnoses. On multivariable analysis, antibiotics were less often prescribed in telehealth than F2F consultations for sore throat (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; P=.001), URTI (adjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81; P<.001), and otitis media (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84; P=.01). There were no significant differences for acute bronchitis (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.79-1.45; P=.66) or acute sinusitis (adjusted OR 1, 95% CI 0.76-1.32; P=.99). Conclusions: GP registrars are less likely to prescribe antibiotics for sore throat, URTI, and otitis media when seeing patients by telehealth versus F2F. Understanding the reason for this difference is essential to help guide educational efforts aimed at decreasing antibiotic prescribing by GPs for conditions such as ARTIs where they are of little to no benefit. There was no evidence in this study that telehealth consultations were associated with greater registrar antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs. Therefore, there is no deleterious effect on antibiotic stewardship.

Background: In Australia, a government insurance scheme (Medicare) pays set rebates for a range of distinct general practitioner (GP) services. GPs may ‘bulk-bill’ and accept the Medicare rebate fee directly, or ‘privately-bill’ by charging the patient a higher fee that is partially reimbursed by Medicare. The billing behaviour of Australian GP registrars (trainees) and their decision to bulk- or privately-bill patients is an evidence gap. This study aimed to establish the prevalence and associations of registrars’ bulk-billing versus private-billing. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data from the ReCEnT study, 2010–2021. The primary analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression, with the outcome factor being whether a consultation was bulk-billed versus privately-billed. The primary analysis excluded practices that universally bulk-bill or universally privately-bill all patients. A secondary analysis included all practices regardless of billing policy to provide an overall perspective of billing across the breadth of GP vocational training. Results: For the primary analysis, 3,086 GP registrars recorded details of 316,141 consultations. Bulk-billing accounted for 61.8%, [95% CI:61.6%, 62.0%] of consultations. Significant positive associations of bulk-billing included: younger and older patient age (compared to patients aged 15–34 years, aOR 5.45; CI: [5.06, 5.87] for patients aged 0–14 years, aOR 2.36; 95% CI: [2.24, 2.49] for patients aged 65–74 years, and aOR 4.48; CI: [4.13, 4.85] for 75 years-and-older). Significant negative associations of bulk-billing included patients new to the practice (aOR 0.39; CI: [0.37, 0.41]) and patients new to the registrar (aOR 0.56; CI: [0.55, 0.58]), compared to existing patients of the registrar and practice; and practices with lesser socio-economic disadvantage (aOR 0.91; CI: [0.89, 0.93] per decile decrease in socioeconomic disadvantage). Bulk-billed consultations were positively associated with arranging patient follow-up (with the registrar aOR 1.06; CI: [1.03, 1.09]; or with another GP in the practice aOR 1.40; CI: [1.33, 1.46]). Conclusions: Registrar billing decisions may, in part, reflect government bulk-billing incentives but our findings suggest other factors may contribute, including the provision of affordable care recognising patient need (children and elderly, and those living in areas of greater socioeconomic disadvantage) and continuity of care. Further research is needed to better understand how, and why, registrars make billing decisions.

Asthma is one of the most common chronic illnesses affecting children. Long-term asthma control medications (LTACMs) are an important aspect of asthma management, with under-prescription associated with poor asthma control and increased asthma deaths. This study aimed to document temporal trends in the prescribing of LTACMs for paediatric patients for asthma-related presentations to Australian general practice registrars (trainees). Longitudinal analyses of data from 2010 to 2022 from the Registrars Clinical Encounters in Training study were undertaken. Proportions of paediatric presentations where LTACMs were prescribed were calculated, and temporal trends analysed and graphed. There was no change over time in registrar prescribing of LTACMs for paediatric asthma, although temporal changes were seen in the types of LTACMs prescribed. The lack of temporal increase in overall LTACMs prescription, despite evidence showing their importance in preventing asthma morbidity and mortality, has significant educational, clinical, and policy implications.

BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat. Australia has high antibiotic prescribing rates with the majority of antibiotics prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) for self-limiting acute respiratory tract infection (ARTIs). Australian GP trainees’ (registrars’) prescribing for ARTIs may have been affected by the introduction of remunerated telehealth consultations in 2020. Understanding of the impact of telehealth on antibiotic stewardship may inform registrar educational programs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing by GP registrars in telehealth versus face-to-face (F2F) consultations for common cold (upper respiratory tract infection [URTI]), bronchitis, sore throat, acute otitis media, and sinusitis. METHODS A cross-sectional analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, a multicenter inception cohort study of registrars’ in-consultation clinical and educational experiences. Analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression using 2020-2023 ReCEnT data. The outcome variable was “antibiotic prescribed” for new presentations of URTI, acute sore throat, acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis, and acute otitis media. The study factor was consultation type (telehealth or F2F). RESULTS A total of 2392 registrars participated (response rate=93.4%). The proportions of diagnoses that were managed via telehealth were 25% (5283/21384) overall, 19% (641/3327) for acute sore throat, 29% (3733/12773) for URTI, 21% (364/1772), for acute bronchitis, 4.1% (72/1758) for acute otitis media, and 27% (473/1754) for acute sinusitis. Antibiotics were prescribed for 51% (1685/3327) of sore throat diagnoses, 6.9% (880/12773) of URTI diagnoses, 64% (1140/1772) of bronchitis diagnoses, 61% (1067/1754) of sinusitis diagnoses, and 73% (1278/1758) of otitis media diagnoses. On multivariable analysis, antibiotics were less often prescribed in telehealth than F2F consultations for sore throat (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; P=.001), URTI (adjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81; P<.001), and otitis media (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84; P=.01). There were no significant differences for acute bronchitis (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.79-1.45; P=.66) or acute sinusitis (adjusted OR 1, 95% CI 0.76-1.32; P=.99). CONCLUSIONS GP registrars are less likely to prescribe antibiotics for sore throat, URTI, and otitis media when seeing patients by telehealth versus F2F. Understanding the reason for this difference is essential to help guide educational efforts aimed at decreasing antibiotic prescribing by GPs for conditions such as ARTIs where they are of little to no benefit. There was no evidence in this study that telehealth consultations were associated with greater registrar antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs. Therefore, there is no deleterious effect on antibiotic stewardship. CLINICALTRIAL

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a multi-component educational program aimed at improving general practitioner (GP) trainees’ (registrars') deprescribing in patients 65 years and over. The hypothesis was that an educational program would increase registrars' deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) in older patients, relative to a control group, six months post-education. Design: This was a pragmatic, non-randomised, non-equivalent control group design nested within an ongoing cohort study of registrars' practice (the ReCEnT study). The program consisted of an online module, face-to-face sessions for registrars, webinars for their supervisors, and facilitation of the registrar–supervisor dyad, including case-based discussions of deprescribing in teaching meetings. The program was underpinned by the Behaviour Change Wheel framework and delivered to registrars of a single registrar educational/training organisation (other educational/training organisations served as controls). Primary outcome measures were deprescribing any medicines and deprescribing medicines categorised as PIMs. Secondary outcomes were deprescribing of medications taken for three months or more and dose reduction with a view to deprescribing (cessation). Findings: Data from 779 education-receiving registrars and 438 control registrars were analysed. Intervention group registrars showed no significant increase in deprescribing of any medication compared to controls (interaction aOR 1.00 (95%CI 0.69, 1.46) or of PIMs (aOR 1.29 (95%CI 0.74, 2.24), or significant changes in secondary outcomes. Research implications: Despite no differences in prescribing, in this analysis, six months post-intervention, aspects of the findings suggest extended observation and further evaluation may be indicated. Practical implications: The continuation of education for registrars around deprescribing of PIMs is essential. Further investigation is required to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the behaviour change approach adopted in this study. Originality/value: The multi-component behaviour change theory-based approach is novel for this educational setting, and this is an initial step in evaluating the approach. Limitations: The major limitation is that randomisation in the study design was not practicable.

Background: Remunerated telehealth consultations were introduced in Australia in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Videoconferencing has advantages over telephone-consulting, including improved diagnostic and decision-making accuracy. However, videoconferencing uptake in Australia has been low. This study aimed to establish prevalence and associations of video versus telephone consultations in Australian general practice (GP) registrars’ practice. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data from 2020 to 2021 (three 6-monthly data-collection rounds) from the Registrars Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study. GP registrars record details of 60 consecutive consultations every 6-month term, for a total of 3 terms. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed within the Generalized Estimating Equations framework with the outcome video versus telephone. Results: 102,286 consultations were recorded by 1,168 registrars, with 21.4% of consultations performed via telehealth. Of these, telephone accounted for 96.6% (95% CI: 96.3–96.8%) and videoconferencing for 3.4% (95% CI: 3.2–3.7%). Statistically significant associations of using videoconferencing, compared to telephone, included longer consultation duration (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03 per minute; and mean 14.9 versus 12.8 min), patients aged 0–14 years old (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03–1.62, compared to age 15–34), patients new to the registrar (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04–1.35), part-time registrars (OR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.08–3.15), and areas of less socioeconomic disadvantage (OR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00–1.62 per decile). Conclusions: Registrars’ telehealth consultations were mostly performed via telephone. Telephone use being associated with socioeconomic disadvantage has health equity implications. Future research should explore barriers to videoconferencing use and strategies to increase its uptake.

In GP training, identifying early predictors of poor summative examination performance can be challenging. We aimed to establish whether external clinical teaching visit (ECTV) performance, measured using a validated instrument (GP Registrar Competency Assessment Grid, GPR-CAG) is predictive of Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Fellowship examination performance. A retrospective cohort study including GP registrars in New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory with ECTV data recorded during their first training term (GPT1), between 2014 and 2018, who attempted at least one Fellowship examination. Independent variables of interest included the four GPR-CAG factors assessed in GPT1 ('patient-centredness/caring', 'formulating hypotheses/management plans', 'professional responsibilities', 'physical examination skills'). Outcomes of interest included individual scores of the three summative examinations (Applied Knowledge Test (AKT); Key Feature Problem (KFP); and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)) and overall Pass/Fail status. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Univariably, there were statistically significant associations (p < 0.01) between all four GPR-CAG factors and all four summative examination outcomes, except for 'formulating hypotheses/management plans' and OSCE score (p = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, each factor was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with at least one exam outcome, and 'physical examination skills' was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with all four exam outcomes. ECTV performance, via GPR-CAG scores, is predictive of RACGP Fellowship exam performance. The univariable findings highlight the pragmatic utility of ECTVs in flagging registrars who are at-risk of poor exam performance, facilitating early intervention. The multivariable associations of GPR-CAG scores and examination performance suggest that these scores provide predictive ability beyond that of other known predictors.

Background: Prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic, remuneration was introduced for Australian general practice telehealth consultations. General practitioner (GP) trainees’ telehealth use is of clinical, educational, and policy importance. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and associations of telehealth versus face-to-face consultations amongst Australian GP registrars (vocational GP trainees). Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, from 2020 to 2021 (three 6-month terms), including registrars in 3 of Australia’s 9 Regional Training Organisations. In ReCEnT, GP registrars record details of 60 consecutive consultations, 6 monthly. The primary analysis used univariate and multivariable logistic regression, with outcome of whether the consultation was conducted via telehealth (phone and videoconference) or face-to-face. Results: 1,168 registrars recorded details of 102,286 consultations, of which 21.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.1%–21.6%) were conducted via telehealth. Statistically significant associations of a telehealth consultation included shorter consultation duration (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% CI: 0.93–0.94; and mean 12.9 versus 18.7 min); fewer problems addressed per consultation (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87–0.97); being less likely to seek assistance from a supervisor (OR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76–0.96) while being more likely to generate learning goals (OR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.37); and being more likely to arrange a follow-up consultation (OR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.35). Conclusions: That telehealth consultations were shorter, with higher rates of follow-up, has GP workforce/workload implications. That telehealth consultations were less likely to involve in-consultation supervisor support, but more likely to generate learning goals, has educational implications.