Qianli Liao

The main success stories of deep learning, starting with ImageNet, depend on deep convolutional networks, which on certain tasks perform significantly better than traditional shallow classifiers, such as support vector machines, and also better than deep fully connected networks; but what is so special about deep convolutional networks? Recent results in approximation theory proved an exponential advantage of deep convolutional networks with or without shared weights in approximating functions with hierarchical locality in their compositional structure. More recently, the hierarchical structure was proved to be hard to learn from data, suggesting that it is a powerful prior embedded in the architecture of the network. These mathematical results, however, do not say which real-life tasks correspond to input-output functions with hierarchical locality. To evaluate this, we consider a set of visual tasks where we disrupt the local organization of images via "deterministic scrambling" to later perform a visual task on these images structurally-altered in the same way for training and testing. For object recognition we find, as expected, that scrambling does not affect the performance of shallow or deep fully connected networks contrary to the out-performance of convolutional networks. Not all tasks involving images are however affected. Texture perception and global color estimation are much less sensitive to deterministic scrambling showing that the underlying functions corresponding to these tasks are not hierarchically local; and also counter-intuitively showing that these tasks are better approximated by networks that are not deep (texture) nor convolutional (color). Altogether, these results shed light into the importance of matching a network architecture with its embedded prior of the task to be learned.

Is visual cortex made up of general-purpose information processing machinery, or does it consist of a collection of specialized modules? If prior knowledge, acquired from learning a set of objects is only transferable to new objects that share properties with the old, then the recognition system's optimal organization must be one containing specialized modules for different object classes. Our analysis starts from a premise we call the invariance hypothesis: that the computational goal of the ventral stream is to compute an invariant-to-transformations and discriminative signature for recognition. The key condition enabling approximate transfer of invariance without sacrificing discriminability turns out to be that the learned and novel objects transform similarly. This implies that the optimal recognition system must contain subsystems trained only with data from similarly-transforming objects and suggests a novel interpretation of domain-specific regions like the fusiform face area (FFA). Furthermore, we can define an index of transformation-compatibility, computable from videos, that can be combined with information about the statistics of natural vision to yield predictions for which object categories ought to have domain-specific regions in agreement with the available data. The result is a unifying account linking the large literature on view-based recognition with the wealth of experimental evidence concerning domain-specific regions.