AMAref Moalemi
Aref Moalemi
*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Aref Moalemi has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Henrik Bredmose
DTU Wind and Energy Systems, Koppels Allé, Building 403, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
3 shared publications - Trygve Kristiansen
MARINTEK, Trondheim, Norway
2 shared publications - Amin Ghadirian
Department of Wind Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
1 shared publication - Christine Lynggård Hansen
DTU Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark
1 shared publication - Fabio Pierella
Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, DK-2800 Denmark
1 shared publication - Hugh Wolgamot
University of Western Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 341
Design Waves and low-frequency responses of a semi-sub floating wind turbine in spread seas
- 16 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 341
Open AccessDesign Waves and low-frequency responses of a semi-sub floating wind turbine in spread seas
- Open Access
- 10 April 2024
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Vol. 984, A65
Wave front perturbation effect on the variability of monopile wave impact loads
The slamming wave force and pressure variabilities for monopile wave impacts are studied as functions of wave breaking shape and transverse perturbations on the breaking wave front. The impacting wave topology is characterized as slosh, flip-through, $\varOmega$ , overturning and fully broken. Fifty test repetitions are conducted for each type of wave impact to assess the variability of force impulse, force and pressure. The results for the unperturbed cases show that the slamming force is highest among the nominal slosh, flip-through and $\varOmega$ tests, and that the slamming force variability is highest for the first two. We demonstrate that the slamming force and pressure variabilities decrease notably after selecting and regrouping the tests by similar crest heights and temporal slopes measured at an upstream wave gauge. The group representing $\varOmega$ wave impacts shows the largest mean slamming force and peak pressure, and their variability is the highest among all groups. Further, the effect of lateral perturbations on the pressure, force and impulse variabilities is investigated. Due to the perturbations, the slamming pressure variability for the wave impacts in which the wave front hits the monopile surface increases significantly. The variability of the slamming force is also increased for the perturbed impacts; however, it is smaller than the slamming pressure variability. The force impulse variability shows a low sensitivity to perturbations, and its magnitude is smaller than that of the force variability. Finally, the slamming pressure using fifteen pressure sensors for five selected events is studied. For these tests, oscillations at frequencies associated with structural or bubble oscillations are seen. Further, the air entertainment is documented through video recordings.- 10 April 2024
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Vol. 984, A65
Open AccessWave front perturbation effect on the variability of monopile wave impact loads
The slamming wave force and pressure variabilities for monopile wave impacts are studied as functions of wave breaking shape and transverse perturbations on the breaking wave front. The impacting wave topology is characterized as slosh, flip-through, $\varOmega$ , overturning and fully broken. Fifty test repetitions are conducted for each type of wave impact to assess the variability of force impulse, force and pressure. The results for the unperturbed cases show that the slamming force is highest among the nominal slosh, flip-through and $\varOmega$ tests, and that the slamming force variability is highest for the first two. We demonstrate that the slamming force and pressure variabilities decrease notably after selecting and regrouping the tests by similar crest heights and temporal slopes measured at an upstream wave gauge. The group representing $\varOmega$ wave impacts shows the largest mean slamming force and peak pressure, and their variability is the highest among all groups. Further, the effect of lateral perturbations on the pressure, force and impulse variabilities is investigated. Due to the perturbations, the slamming pressure variability for the wave impacts in which the wave front hits the monopile surface increases significantly. The variability of the slamming force is also increased for the perturbed impacts; however, it is smaller than the slamming pressure variability. The force impulse variability shows a low sensitivity to perturbations, and its magnitude is smaller than that of the force variability. Finally, the slamming pressure using fifteen pressure sensors for five selected events is studied. For these tests, oscillations at frequencies associated with structural or bubble oscillations are seen. Further, the air entertainment is documented through video recordings. - Open Access
- 16 June 2023
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Vol. 965, A16
Cylinder water entry on a perturbed water surface
The perturbations existing on a breaking wavefront can be a potential explanation for the slamming pressure variability in wave impacts. Here, we investigate the effect of these perturbations by forced vertical slamming of a two-dimensional circular cylinder with constant downward velocity on standing waves. Through experimental modelling and numerical simulation, the slamming force is measured for several standing wave amplitudes and wavelengths. The standing wave phase is tuned such that the impact occurs symmetrically at the instant of maximum crest or trough. Our observations show that slamming coefficients vary with the standing wave amplitude when the wavelength is kept constant and vice versa. The trough impact slamming coefficient can be more than two times the flat impact, and up to four times the crest impact. The experimental results are reproduced by numerical simulations and they agree reasonably well in general. Two analytical approaches based on the von Kármán (NACA, vol. 321, 1929, pp. 1–8) and Wagner (Z. Angew. Math. Mech., vol. 12, 1932, pp. 913–215) methods, which consider the effect of water surface curvature, are introduced. The slamming coefficient calculated from these methods can provide a bound in which the slamming coefficient can be found for each standing wave amplitude and wavelength. Further insight is achieved by numerical simulations of impact on the shorter wavelength to diameter ratio of $0.05<\lambda /D<0.4$ . As the wavelength to diameter ratio becomes smaller, the cylinder impacts the water surface at several locations. As a result, multiple peaks occur, and the trapped air at different locations between the cylinder and the water surface yields oscillations with different frequencies on the slamming coefficient time history.- 16 June 2023
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Vol. 965, A16
Open AccessCylinder water entry on a perturbed water surface
The perturbations existing on a breaking wavefront can be a potential explanation for the slamming pressure variability in wave impacts. Here, we investigate the effect of these perturbations by forced vertical slamming of a two-dimensional circular cylinder with constant downward velocity on standing waves. Through experimental modelling and numerical simulation, the slamming force is measured for several standing wave amplitudes and wavelengths. The standing wave phase is tuned such that the impact occurs symmetrically at the instant of maximum crest or trough. Our observations show that slamming coefficients vary with the standing wave amplitude when the wavelength is kept constant and vice versa. The trough impact slamming coefficient can be more than two times the flat impact, and up to four times the crest impact. The experimental results are reproduced by numerical simulations and they agree reasonably well in general. Two analytical approaches based on the von Kármán (NACA, vol. 321, 1929, pp. 1–8) and Wagner (Z. Angew. Math. Mech., vol. 12, 1932, pp. 913–215) methods, which consider the effect of water surface curvature, are introduced. The slamming coefficient calculated from these methods can provide a bound in which the slamming coefficient can be found for each standing wave amplitude and wavelength. Further insight is achieved by numerical simulations of impact on the shorter wavelength to diameter ratio of $0.05<\lambda /D<0.4$ . As the wavelength to diameter ratio becomes smaller, the cylinder impacts the water surface at several locations. As a result, multiple peaks occur, and the trapped air at different locations between the cylinder and the water surface yields oscillations with different frequencies on the slamming coefficient time history.