Réka Aliz Lukács

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), combining aspirin with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (P2Y12i), remains central to the management of acute myocardial infarction (MI), especially in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet therapy may vary with body composition. This study investigates the association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in MI patients treated with PCI and DAPT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 52,119 MI patients treated with coronary stenting from 2014 to 2021, sourced from the Hungarian Myocardial Infarction Registry. Patients were stratified into clopidogrel-based (n = 44,480) and potent P2Y12i-based (prasugrel or ticagrelor; n = 7639) DAPT cohorts. Clinical outcomes—including 12-month mortality and ischemic events—were assessed across BMI categories. Kaplan–Meier analysis and LASSO Cox regression identified predictors of mortality, while decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated the net clinical benefit of potent P2Y12i across BMI strata. Results: Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified BMI and potent P2Y12i treatment as significant predictors of 365-day mortality, with higher BMI associated with lower observed rates of mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and stroke. However, higher BMI was also associated with an increased risk of repeat revascularization and PCI. This study found that the protective effect of potent P2Y12i treatment was consistent across different BMI categories. Conclusions: In patients with MI undergoing PCI, elevated BMI was paradoxically associated with more favorable short-term outcomes, including reduced mortality. Potent P2Y12i therapy demonstrated a consistent benefit across BMI categories, supporting its broad application irrespective of body mass.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which is essential in AMI management, combines aspirin with a P2Y12 receptor antagonist. This study compared the effectiveness of potent P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in AMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: 65,986 AMI patients included in a nationwide prospective registry who underwent PCI and received DAPT were studied. In total, 9,014 patients received potent P2Y12 inhibitors, and 56,074 received clopidogrel. This study focused on mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over seven years. The analysis utilized unadjusted models and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to compare prognosis, and decision curve analyses were constructed to aid clinical decision making. Results: Potent P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced mortality risk (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.58; IPTW HR: 0.68) and MACE (unadjusted HR: 0.66; IPTW HR: 0.78). Diabetic patients showed greater benefits (HR:0.45). In patients at high bleeding risk, the mortality rate was 13% (HR: 0.87, p = 0.08). For patients aged 75–79, the HR for mortality was 0.82, whereas for those aged >80 years, it was 0.79, indicating significant mortality risk reduction. Similar trends were observed for MACE. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that potent P2Y12 inhibitors are more effective than clopidogrel in reducing mortality and MACE in patients with AMI and underscored their potential role in improving outcomes across diverse patient subgroups. The trend was consistent even during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings highlight the need for personalized DAPT strategies, particularly for high-bleeding-risk patients, and challenge current guidelines favoring clopidogrel use in older patients.

Background: The QLV ratio (QLV/baseline QRS width) is an established intraoperative-measurable parameter during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, potentially predicting the efficacy of electrical resynchronization. Methods: Left bundle branch area pacing-optimized CRT (LOT-CRT) is a novel approach with the potential to improve both responder rate and responder level in the CRT candidate patient group, even when an optimal electro-anatomical left ventricular lead position is not achievable. In our observational study, 72 CRT-defibrillator candidate patients with a QRS duration of 160 ± 12 ms were consecutively implanted. Using a QLV-ratio-based implant strategy, 40 patients received a biventricular CRT device (Biv-CRT) with an optimal QLV ratio (≥70%). Twenty-eight patients with a suboptimal QLV ratio (p = 0.024). At 12 months, the LOT-CRT group also demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (14.9 ± 8% vs. 10.3 ± 7.4%; p = 0.001), and New York Heart Association functional class (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4; p = 0.031), and a significant decrease in NT-pro-BNP levels (1863± 380 pg/mL vs. 1238 ± 412 pg/mL; p = 0.012). Notably, the LOT-CRT patients showed results comparable to Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio (>80%) in terms of QRS width reduction and LVEF improvement. Conclusions: Our single-center study demonstrated the feasibility of a QLV-ratio-based implantation strategy during CRT implantation. Patients with a LOT-CRT system showed significant improvements, whereas Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio may not be expected to benefit from an additional LOT-CRT upgrade.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is gold standard treatment option among patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and intraventricular conduction delay of left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. Purpose: Left bundle branch area pacing optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT CRT) is a novel and promising approach for CRT candidate patients even in advanced intraventricular conduction delay, however convincing follow-up data regarding this patient group is still lacking. Methods: In our observational registry 35 LOT CRT vs. 35 conventional CRT patients were consecutively implanted according to current guidelines. All the patients had LBBB morphology QRS width of >150 ms. The two compared patient group did not show significant difference in age, gender, baseline non-ischemic etiology, LVEF, NYHA functional class, LBBB QRS width. Results: Immediate postoperative results showed significantly increased QRS width reduction (p=.028) and at 6 months of follow-up a significantly greater improvement in LVEF(p=.031), NYHA functional class (p=.04) and Nt-ProBNP levels (p=0.043) were seen in LOT CRT patient group compared to conventional CRT patients. Conclusion: Our single center observational study showed significant improvement in prompt postoperative QRS width and clinical follow-up parameters in LOT CRT implanted patients compared to conventional CRT implanted patients.LOTCRTvs.CRTQRSwidthreductionLOTCRTXray

Background: Endovascular therapy offers an alternative for treating femoropopliteal (FP) and infrapopliteal (IP) lesions related to occlusive lower extremity artery disease. Despite numerous trials, the effectiveness of restenosis prevention using local drug delivery devices remains a topic of debate. Objectives: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted. Our overall aim was to summarize the most recent clinical evidence regarding endovascular approaches for FP and IP atherosclerotic lesions. Methods: We conducted a search for randomized trials in the MEDLINE database, and extracted data related to clinical endpoints. Our primary focus was on the rate of major adverse events (MAEs), including mortality, amputation, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). A multiple treatment network meta-analysis supplemented with component network analyses was performed to examine the impact of combined treatment. Results: Our search yielded 33 randomized controlled trials encompassing 5766 patients. This included 19 studies focused on femoropopliteal and 14 on IP lesions, accounting for 3565 and 2201 patients, respectively. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) displayed a reduced MAE risk in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)—RR for DCB: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.52–0.77) and for DES: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51–0.99). The bare-metal stent (BMS) group manifested the most substantial MAE risk, being 59% higher relative to the DCB cohort (BMS vs. DCB RR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03–2.47). For FP lesions, DES was the standout performer, curtailing MAE risk by 55% relative to POBA. Within IP lesions, DES mitigated the MAE risk by 25% versus POBA. DCB did not exhibit any notable MAE reduction when pitted against POBA. Conclusion: In FP arteries, both DESs and DCBs yielded significantly diminished MAEs, thus outpacing other techniques. Regarding IP arteries, only DESs resulted in significantly fewer MAEs. In alignment with contemporary research, our findings revealed no signs of elevated mortality in patients undergoing treatment with drug-eluting apparatuses.

This comprehensive literature review assessed the effectiveness of precision medicine approaches in individualizing P2Y12 de-escalation strategies, such as platelet function testing guidance, genetic testing guidance, and uniform de-escalation, for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Analyzing six trials with a total of 13,729 patients, the cumulative analyses demonstrated a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE), net adverse clinical events (NACE), and major and minor bleeding events with P2Y12 de-escalation. Specifically, the analysis found a 24% reduction of MACE and a 22% reduction of adverse event risk (relative risk (RR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–0.82, and RR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.67–0.92, respectively). Reductions in bleeding events were highest with uniform unguided de-escalation, followed by guided de-escalations, while ischemic event rates were similarly lower across all three strategies. Although the review highlights the potential of individualized P2Y12 de-escalation strategies to offer a safer alternative to the long-term potent P2Y12 inhibitor-based dual antiplatelet therapy, it also indicates that laboratory-guided precision medicine approaches may not yet offer the expected benefits, necessitating further research to optimize individualized strategies and evaluate the potential of precision medicine approaches in this context.