Qihan Lin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Qihan Lin has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Fang Tang
College of Physical Education, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, China
1 shared publication - Haowen Tuo
College of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, China
1 shared publication - Pincao Gao
College of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, China
1 shared publication - Shanshan Yin
Ministry of Public Sports, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China
1 shared publication - Weiguo Liu
College of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, China
1 shared publication - Xinxin Zhang
School of Physical Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Complementary Therapies in Medicine
- Vol. 89, 103145
The effects and optimal dosage of traditional Chinese exercises on patients with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 12 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Complementary Therapies in Medicine
- Vol. 89, 103145
Open AccessThe effects and optimal dosage of traditional Chinese exercises on patients with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Open Access
- 25 January 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 20 (3) , 2189
Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Different Exercise Mode on Carotid Atherosclerosis
(1) Background: There is increasing evidence showing the health benefits of exercise on carotid atherosclerosis. However, little is known about the different exercise modes for carotid atherosclerosis. This study was designed to perform a meta-analysis of effect of different exercise modes on carotid atherosclerosis so as to provide evidence-based suggestions for the prevention and management of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. (2) Methods: Six databases were systematically searched to identify randomized trials that compared exercise to a non-exercise intervention in patient with carotid atherosclerosis. We a priori specified changes in cIMT, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C biomarkers as outcomes. (3) Results: Thirty-four trials met the eligibility criteria, comprising 2420 participants. The main analyses showed pronounced differences on cIMT (MD = −0.06, 95%CI (−0.09, −0.04), p < 0.00001, TC (MD = −0.41, 95%CI (−0.58, −0.23), p < 0.00001), LDL-C (MD = −0.31, 95%CI (−0.43, −0.20), p < 0.00001), and HDL-C (MD = 0.11, 95%CI (0.04, 0.19), p = 0.004), which significantly reduced the risk factors of carotid atherosclerosis disease. In the different exercise modes, the effect was pronounced for aerobic exercise for all outcomes except TC; high-intensity interval exercise also showed significance for all outcomes except TC and HDL-C; aerobic exercise combined with resistance exercise did not affect any outcome except HDL-C; (4) Conclusions: Exercise has a prominent prevention and improvement effect on carotid atherosclerosis. In the perspective of exercise pattern, aerobic exercise and high-intensity intermittent exercise can improve carotid atherosclerosis; however, aerobic exercise has a more comprehensive improvement effect.
- 25 January 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 20 (3) , 2189
Open AccessMeta-Analysis of the Effect of Different Exercise Mode on Carotid Atherosclerosis
(1) Background: There is increasing evidence showing the health benefits of exercise on carotid atherosclerosis. However, little is known about the different exercise modes for carotid atherosclerosis. This study was designed to perform a meta-analysis of effect of different exercise modes on carotid atherosclerosis so as to provide evidence-based suggestions for the prevention and management of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. (2) Methods: Six databases were systematically searched to identify randomized trials that compared exercise to a non-exercise intervention in patient with carotid atherosclerosis. We a priori specified changes in cIMT, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C biomarkers as outcomes. (3) Results: Thirty-four trials met the eligibility criteria, comprising 2420 participants. The main analyses showed pronounced differences on cIMT (MD = −0.06, 95%CI (−0.09, −0.04), p < 0.00001, TC (MD = −0.41, 95%CI (−0.58, −0.23), p < 0.00001), LDL-C (MD = −0.31, 95%CI (−0.43, −0.20), p < 0.00001), and HDL-C (MD = 0.11, 95%CI (0.04, 0.19), p = 0.004), which significantly reduced the risk factors of carotid atherosclerosis disease. In the different exercise modes, the effect was pronounced for aerobic exercise for all outcomes except TC; high-intensity interval exercise also showed significance for all outcomes except TC and HDL-C; aerobic exercise combined with resistance exercise did not affect any outcome except HDL-C; (4) Conclusions: Exercise has a prominent prevention and improvement effect on carotid atherosclerosis. In the perspective of exercise pattern, aerobic exercise and high-intensity intermittent exercise can improve carotid atherosclerosis; however, aerobic exercise has a more comprehensive improvement effect.