Lennert Minten
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Lennert Minten has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexis Puvrez
Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, Adelaide University and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
1 shared publication - Boudewijn Klop
Department of Cardiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
1 shared publication - Camilla Kjellstad Larsen
Institute for Surgical Research, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo , N-0027 Oslo
1 shared publication - Einar Hopp
Oslo University Hospital
1 shared publication - Elena Galli
Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI – UMR 1099, Rennes, France
1 shared publication - Erik Kongsgaard
Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 September 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (18) , 6108
Mechanical Dyssynchrony Combined with Septal Scarring Reliably Identifies Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Background and aim: The presence of mechanical dyssynchrony on echocardiography is associated with reverse remodelling and decreased mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Contrarily, myocardial scar reduces the effect of CRT. This study investigated how well a combined assessment of different markers of mechanical dyssynchrony and scarring identifies CRT responders. Methods: In a prospective multicentre study of 170 CRT recipients, septal flash (SF), apical rocking (ApRock), systolic stretch index (SSI), and lateral-to-septal (LW-S) work differences were assessed using echocardiography. Myocardial scarring was quantified using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or excluded based on a coronary angiogram and clinical history. The primary endpoint was a CRT response, defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume 12 months after implantation. The secondary endpoint was time-to-death. Results: The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring showed AUCs ranging between 0.81 (95%CI: 0.74–0.88) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.79–0.91) for predicting a CRT response, without significant differences between the markers, but significantly higher than mechanical dyssynchrony alone. QRS morphology, QRS duration, and LV ejection fraction were not superior in their prediction. Predictive power was similar in the subgroups of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The combined assessments significantly predicted all-cause mortality at 44 ± 13 months after CRT with a hazard ratio ranging from 0.28 (95%CI: 0.12–0.67) to 0.20 (95%CI: 0.08–0.49). Conclusions: The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring identified CRT responders with high predictive power. Both visual and quantitative markers were highly feasible and demonstrated similar results. This work demonstrates the value of imaging LV mechanics and scarring in CRT candidates, which can already be achieved in a clinical routine.
- 21 September 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (18) , 6108
Open AccessMechanical Dyssynchrony Combined with Septal Scarring Reliably Identifies Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Background and aim: The presence of mechanical dyssynchrony on echocardiography is associated with reverse remodelling and decreased mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Contrarily, myocardial scar reduces the effect of CRT. This study investigated how well a combined assessment of different markers of mechanical dyssynchrony and scarring identifies CRT responders. Methods: In a prospective multicentre study of 170 CRT recipients, septal flash (SF), apical rocking (ApRock), systolic stretch index (SSI), and lateral-to-septal (LW-S) work differences were assessed using echocardiography. Myocardial scarring was quantified using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or excluded based on a coronary angiogram and clinical history. The primary endpoint was a CRT response, defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume 12 months after implantation. The secondary endpoint was time-to-death. Results: The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring showed AUCs ranging between 0.81 (95%CI: 0.74–0.88) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.79–0.91) for predicting a CRT response, without significant differences between the markers, but significantly higher than mechanical dyssynchrony alone. QRS morphology, QRS duration, and LV ejection fraction were not superior in their prediction. Predictive power was similar in the subgroups of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The combined assessments significantly predicted all-cause mortality at 44 ± 13 months after CRT with a hazard ratio ranging from 0.28 (95%CI: 0.12–0.67) to 0.20 (95%CI: 0.08–0.49). Conclusions: The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring identified CRT responders with high predictive power. Both visual and quantitative markers were highly feasible and demonstrated similar results. This work demonstrates the value of imaging LV mechanics and scarring in CRT candidates, which can already be achieved in a clinical routine.