Maan T. Almaghrabi

Introduction Hand rejuvenation addresses aging-related changes such as subcutaneous fat loss, skin degradation, and photodamage. Autologous fat transfer (AFT) has emerged as a promising treatment, offering durable volume augmentation and regenerative effects. This study aims to systematically review the evidence on the techniques, outcomes, and complications of AFT for hand rejuvenation. Methods A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, searching databases such as MEDLINE, SCOPUS, DOAJ, and PUBMED from inception to April 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting on hand rejuvenation using fat grafting, including randomized clinical trials, observational studies, case reports, and case series. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers blindly. Results Eleven studies published between 2001 and 2019 were included, comprising 303 patients with a strong female predominance. Study designs varied, with three randomized clinical trials, seven case series, and one prospective study. High satisfaction rates were consistently reported, with complications being generally infrequent and minor. Various fat grafting techniques were employed, with manual aspiration being the predominant fat harvesting method. Follow-up periods ranged from 5 to 38 months, facilitating thorough evaluation of treatment outcomes. Conclusion AFT for hand rejuvenation is effective and safe, offering high patient satisfaction and minimal complications. Long-term fat retention and regenerative effects of adipose-derived stem cells contribute to success. However, fat graft resorption may require multiple treatments. Future research should standardize assessment tools, volumetrically measure graft resorption, and conduct high-quality trials to optimize protocols. Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Tissue expansion (TE) is a rather widely accepted technique in plastic surgery, with variable indications; among numerous other indications, it is commonly used in scar management. In our research, we focused on the significance of TE as an important armamentarium and valid solution for the treatment of large and old post-burn scars, with good cosmetic and functional outcomes. Our study is a retrospective analysis conducted at Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, during the period from 2020 to 2023. This retrospective analysis included 15 tissue expanders, which were inserted in eight patients with large post-burn scars. Each patient underwent two stages of scar repair using variable-size tissue expanders. Post-operative assessment for scar quality and patient satisfaction was conducted using the POSAS score system in addition to standard documentation. Our study sheds light on the satisfactory and accepted cosmetic and functional outcomes for skin tissue expanders for post-burn scars and deformities.

Objective: To investigate the view of clinicians on diagnostic radiology and its future. Methods: Corresponding authors who published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the Lancet between 2010 and 2022 were asked to participate in a survey about diagnostic radiology and its future. Results: The 331 participating clinicians gave a median score of 9 on a 0–10 point scale to the value of medical imaging in improving patient-relevant outcomes. 40.6%, 15.1%, 18.9%, and 9.5% of clinicians indicated to interpret more than half of radiography, ultrasonography, CT, and MRI examinations completely by themselves, without consulting a radiologist or reading the radiology report. Two hundred eighty-nine clinicians (87.3%) expected an increase in medical imaging utilization in the coming 10 years, whereas 9 clinicians (2.7%) expected a decrease. The need for diagnostic radiologists in the coming 10 years was expected to increase by 162 clinicians (48.9%), to remain stable by 85 clinicians (25.7%), and to decrease by 47 clinicians (14.2%). Two hundred clinicians (60.4%) expected that artificial intelligence (AI) will not make diagnostic radiologists redundant in the coming 10 years, whereas 54 clinicians (16.3%) thought the opposite. Conclusion: Clinicians who published in the New England Journal of Medicine or the Lancet attribute high value to medical imaging. They generally need radiologists for cross-sectional imaging interpretation, but for a considerable proportion of radiographs, their service is not required. Most expect medical imaging utilization and the need for diagnostic radiologists to increase in the foreseeable future, and do not expect AI to make radiologists redundant. Clinical relevance statement: The views of clinicians on radiology and its future may be used to determine how radiology should be practiced and be further developed. Key Points: • Clinicians generally regard medical imaging as high-value care and expect to use more medical imaging in the future. • Clinicians mainly need radiologists for cross-sectional imaging interpretation while they interpret a substantial proportion of radiographs completely by themselves. • The majority of clinicians expects that the need for diagnostic radiologists will not decrease (half of them even expect that we need more) and does not believe that AI will replace radiologists.