Zhiyuan Cheng
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Zhiyuan Cheng has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Yimin Wang
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
2 shared publications - Daidong Wei
CCTEG Xi'an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd. Xi'an China
1 shared publication - Jiachen Liang
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
1 shared publication - Jiahao Hu
School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
1 shared publication - Junpeng Yang
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
1 shared publication - Kunbiao Zhang
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Performance Optimization and Anchorage Enhancement of Cement-Based Grouts Using Fly Ash and Metakaolin
Cement-based grouts used in anchorage engineering often suffer from insufficient flowability, bleeding, and inadequate early-age strength, which may impair grout filling quality and interfacial bonding. This study investigated the synergistic use of fly ash (FA) and metakaolin (MK) to optimize the fresh properties, strength development, microstructure, and early-age anchorage performance of cement-based grouts. Rheological behavior, bleeding rate, and compressive strength were evaluated for grouts with different FA and MK contents, and the overall performance was ranked using the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy were further employed to clarify the underlying microstructural evolution, and laboratory pull-out tests were conducted to verify the early-age anchorage effectiveness of the selected optimal mixtures. The results showed that the optimal performance was achieved at 15–20% FA and 3–6% MK. Within this range, grout viscosity decreased from 0.24 to 0.16 Pa·s, bleeding rate decreased from 13% to 2%, and compressive strength increased markedly at both 7 and 28 days. The optimized grout also increased the peak interfacial shear stress from 0.440 to 0.978 MPa. These improvements were associated with accelerated hydration, reduced CH and residual clinker phases, and a denser hydration-product network. The pull-out specimens failed predominantly along the grout–rock/soil interface, and the improved anchorage response was attributed to a denser hydration-product network that reduced pores and interfacial defects and promoted more efficient shear-stress transfer.
Open AccessPerformance Optimization and Anchorage Enhancement of Cement-Based Grouts Using Fly Ash and Metakaolin
Cement-based grouts used in anchorage engineering often suffer from insufficient flowability, bleeding, and inadequate early-age strength, which may impair grout filling quality and interfacial bonding. This study investigated the synergistic use of fly ash (FA) and metakaolin (MK) to optimize the fresh properties, strength development, microstructure, and early-age anchorage performance of cement-based grouts. Rheological behavior, bleeding rate, and compressive strength were evaluated for grouts with different FA and MK contents, and the overall performance was ranked using the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy were further employed to clarify the underlying microstructural evolution, and laboratory pull-out tests were conducted to verify the early-age anchorage effectiveness of the selected optimal mixtures. The results showed that the optimal performance was achieved at 15–20% FA and 3–6% MK. Within this range, grout viscosity decreased from 0.24 to 0.16 Pa·s, bleeding rate decreased from 13% to 2%, and compressive strength increased markedly at both 7 and 28 days. The optimized grout also increased the peak interfacial shear stress from 0.440 to 0.978 MPa. These improvements were associated with accelerated hydration, reduced CH and residual clinker phases, and a denser hydration-product network. The pull-out specimens failed predominantly along the grout–rock/soil interface, and the improved anchorage response was attributed to a denser hydration-product network that reduced pores and interfacial defects and promoted more efficient shear-stress transfer.
- Open Access
- 5 January 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 14 (2) , 472
Calculation and Analysis of Load Transfer Characteristics of Tensile Anchors for Geotechnical Anchoring Systems
In order to explore the problems of load transfer and anchorage mechanisms of tensile anchors under pull-out load for geotechnical anchoring systems, a step-wise mathematical model is established which considers the linear–nonlinear shear stress and shear displacement of the anchorage segment, using an elasto-plastic constitutive model. The displacement, axial force, and shear stress of the anchorage interface in different stages (elastic, plastic, and debonding) are analyzed and solutions are derived. And the theoretical solutions for the ultimate pull-out load of the anchor at each stage are also presented. Two in situ pull-out tests are used to verify and apply these findings in engineering. The results show that the stepwise composite model could reflect the bonding, softening and residual characteristics of the anchoring interface. In the process of the pull-out load increasing, the pulling end of the anchor initially enters the plastic stage and the debonding stage, respectively, and the failure of the anchor occurs at the pulling end, and as the axial force transfers down deeper, the damage gradually spreads deeper. The axial force distribution of the anchorage section is a monotonically decreasing curve, and the peak point of the shear stress gradually moves deeper. The calculation results of the axial force distribution curve and load–displacement curve of the anchor are in good agreement with the measured values, which verifies the rationality and reliability of the theoretical prediction method. This method can provide a theoretical reference for the load transfer analysis and design of tension anchors for geotechnical anchoring systems.
- 5 January 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 14 (2) , 472
Open AccessCalculation and Analysis of Load Transfer Characteristics of Tensile Anchors for Geotechnical Anchoring Systems
In order to explore the problems of load transfer and anchorage mechanisms of tensile anchors under pull-out load for geotechnical anchoring systems, a step-wise mathematical model is established which considers the linear–nonlinear shear stress and shear displacement of the anchorage segment, using an elasto-plastic constitutive model. The displacement, axial force, and shear stress of the anchorage interface in different stages (elastic, plastic, and debonding) are analyzed and solutions are derived. And the theoretical solutions for the ultimate pull-out load of the anchor at each stage are also presented. Two in situ pull-out tests are used to verify and apply these findings in engineering. The results show that the stepwise composite model could reflect the bonding, softening and residual characteristics of the anchoring interface. In the process of the pull-out load increasing, the pulling end of the anchor initially enters the plastic stage and the debonding stage, respectively, and the failure of the anchor occurs at the pulling end, and as the axial force transfers down deeper, the damage gradually spreads deeper. The axial force distribution of the anchorage section is a monotonically decreasing curve, and the peak point of the shear stress gradually moves deeper. The calculation results of the axial force distribution curve and load–displacement curve of the anchor are in good agreement with the measured values, which verifies the rationality and reliability of the theoretical prediction method. This method can provide a theoretical reference for the load transfer analysis and design of tension anchors for geotechnical anchoring systems.