DMDamien Marchese

Damien Marchese

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Damien Marchese has a total of 29 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    EGFR-Mediated Mechanotransduction in Aortic Valve Cells: A Key Pathway in Response to Wall Shear Stress

    by Amélie Gasté, Damien Marchese, Adèle Faucherre, Louna Lopez, Eric Bertrand, Alexis Théron, Marine Herbane, Amel Seddik, Chris Jopling, Jean-François Avierinos, et al.

    Aim: Blood flow-induced mechanical forces, particularly wall shear stress (WSS), play a fundamental role in aortic valve remodeling and maturation. Dysregulation of these processes contributes to age-related valve diseases, such as aortic stenosis and regurgitation. While epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling has been implicated in valve development, its role in mechanotransduction remains unclear. This study aims to investigate how EGFR regulates WSS-induced signaling in valvular cells and explore its interaction with the mechanosensitive ion channel PIEZO1. Methods and Results: To investigate the role of EGFR in valvular cell mechanotransduction, we used conditional Egfr flox allele to selectively delete Egfr in valvular cells. Histological analysis revealed increased valve leaflet thickness and hyperproliferation of mesenchymal cells when Egfr was deleted both endothelial (Tie2-Cre lineage) and mesenchymal (Sm22α-Cre lineage) cells. This was accompanied by a reduction in maturation-related genes ( Egr1, Nos3, Tgf-β ) and extracellular matrix (ECM) components. We previously demonstrated that Egr1 expression is regulated by WSS in valvular endothelial cells, prompting further exploration of Egr1’s role in valvular cells. In vitro, Egr1 overexpression and shRNA-mediated knockdown confirmed its role in regulating Nos3, Col1a1, and Tgf-β , key mediators of valve remodeling. Using a pulsatile WSS-mimicking device, we found that WSS induces Erk1/2 phosphorylation and Egr1 expression in valvular cells, both of which were abolished by EGFR inhibition. However, direct EGFR activation via EGF failed to replicate WSS-induced Egr1 expression, suggesting the involvement of additional mechanosensitive pathways. Pharmacological studies further revealed that PIEZO1 inhibition impaired WSS-induced Egr1 expression, while PIEZO1 activation (via YODA) mimicked WSS effects on Erk1/2 phosphorylation and Egr1 expression. These findings suggest a functional interaction between EGFR and PIEZO1 in mechanotransduction, linking mechanical forces to key molecular pathways in valve remodeling. Conclusion: Our findings establish EGFR as a critical mediator of WSS-induced mechanotransduction in valve remodeling, working in synergy with PIEZO1 to regulate flow-sensitive transcription factors such as Egr1. This study provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms governing valve maturation and highlights potential therapeutic targets for age-related valve pathologies linked to abnormal WSS responses. Translational Perspective: Our study highlights the pivotal role of EGFR and the mechanosensitive ion channel PIEZO1 in aortic valve cell responses to wall shear stress (WSS), offering new insights into valve remodeling. The findings suggest that dysregulated EGFR signaling contributes to valve thickening and stenosis, key factors in age-related valvular heart disease. By identifying EGFR-PIEZO1 as a critical mechanotransduction pathway, our work provides a potential therapeutic target for early intervention in aortic valve disease. Modulating EGFR or PIEZO1 activity could help mitigate pathological valve remodeling, presenting novel strategies for treating or preventing degenerative valve disorders.

  • Open Access

    Homeodomain Involvement in Nuclear HOX Protein Homo- and Heterodimerization

    by Damien Marchese, Laetitia Evrard, Isabelle Bergiers, Ludovic Boas, Justine Duphénieux, Maryse Hermant, Tamara Pringels, Fisnik Zeqiri, Marc Pirson, Jean-Claude Twizere, et al.

    HOX genes play essential roles in patterning the anteroposterior axis of animal embryos and in the formation of various organs. In mammals, there are 39 HOX genes organized into four clusters (HOXA–D) located on different chromosomes. In relationship with their orderly arrangement along the chromosomes, these genes show nested expression patterns which imply that embryonic territories co-express multiple HOX genes along the main body axis. Interactomic database entries, as well as a handful of publications, support that some HOX proteins can form homodimers or interact with other HOX proteins. However, the consequences of HOX protein interactions have been poorly investigated and remain largely elusive. In this study, we compiled a repository of all HOX–HOX interactions from available databases, and taking HOXA1, HOXA2, and HOXA5 as examples, we investigated the capacity of HOX proteins to form homo- and heterodimers. We revealed that while the DNA-binding domain, the homeodomain, is not necessary for HOXA1 homodimerization, the nuclear localization of the dimerization is dependent on the homeodomain, particularly the integrity of the third helix of HOXA1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that HOXA1 can influence the localization of HOXA1 when it is deprived of the homeodomain, increasing its abundance in the chromatin-containing fraction. Moreover, HOXA1 nuclear homodimerization occurs independently of the integrity of the hexapeptide and, consequently, of its well-known interactor, the homeodomain protein PBX. These results hint at a potential involvement of dimerization in the complex landscape of HOX regulatory mechanisms.


  • Open Access

    Lhx4 surpasses its paralog Lhx3 in promoting the differentiation of spinal V2a interneurons

    by Estelle Renaux, Charlotte Baudouin, Damien Marchese, Yoanne Clovis, Soo-Kyung Lee, Françoise Gofflot, René Rezsohazy, Frédéric Clotman

    Paralog factors are considered to ensure the robustness of biological processes by providing redundant activity in cells where they are co-expressed. However, the specific contribution of each factor is frequently underestimated. In the developing spinal cord, multiple families of transcription factors successively contribute to differentiate an initially homogenous population of neural progenitors into a myriad of neuronal subsets with distinct molecular, morphological, and functional characteristics. The LIM-homeodomain transcription factors Lhx3, Lhx4, Isl1 and Isl2 promote the segregation and differentiation of spinal motor neurons and V2 interneurons. Based on their high sequence identity and their similar distribution, the Lhx3 and Lhx4 paralogs are considered to contribute similarly to these processes. However, the specific contribution of Lhx4 has never been studied. Here, we provide evidence that Lhx3 and Lhx4 are present in the same cell populations during spinal cord development. Similarly to Lhx3, Lhx4 can form multiproteic complexes with Isl1 or Isl2 and the nuclear LIM interactor NLI. Lhx4 can stimulate a V2-specific enhancer more efficiently than Lhx3 and surpasses Lhx3 in promoting the differentiation of V2a interneurons in chicken embryo electroporation experiments. Finally, Lhx4 inactivation in mice results in alterations of differentiation of the V2a subpopulation, but not of motor neuron production, suggesting that Lhx4 plays unique roles in V2a differentiation that are not compensated by the presence of Lhx3. Thus, Lhx4 could be the major LIM-HD factor involved in V2a interneuron differentiation during spinal cord development and should be considered for in vitro differentiation of spinal neuronal populations.