JTJun Tan

Jun Tan

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Jun Tan has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Numerical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Formation of Thermal Stratification in Water Bodies

    by Zhenglong Du, Yun Wang, Zhiben Shen, Shiping He, Jun Tan

    Controlled thermal stratification in water is crucial for applications such as testing the thermal stealth of underwater vehicles and studying aquatic ecosystems. However, existing laboratory methods for generating such stratified environments often lack stability and uniformity. This study systematically investigates the influence of various hot water injection methods on the stability of thermal stratification. A computational fluid dynamics model, incorporating the overlapping dynamic mesh technique and the Volume of Fluid free-surface capturing method, was used to compare four generation strategies: single-side fixed discharge, towed horizontal discharge, towed vertical upward discharge, and multi-nozzle towed vertical upward discharge. The results indicate that towed discharge methods produce more stable and uniform thermal stratification compared to the fixed discharge method, achieving a 10.1% increase in the water body’s vertical stability coefficient and a 4.5% increase in the Richardson number, while the maximum surface temperature difference was significantly reduced from 0.98 K to 0.37 K. Among the towed methods, vertical upward discharge demonstrated superior stability over horizontal discharge, as it directly transports the high-temperature plume to the upper layer, minimizing thermal exchange with the lower layer, with its vertical stability coefficient and Richardson number being 17.9% and 23% higher, respectively. While maintaining a constant heat input per unit volume, the multi-nozzle configuration yielded N2 and Ri values comparable to the single-nozzle version, while further improving the temperature uniformity at the free surface. Consequently, the towed vertical upward discharge emerges as a highly efficient method for establishing stable and uniform thermal stratification, with the multi-nozzle configuration showing significant promise for large-scale applications. This study provides a valuable reference for creating stratified fluid environments and for related engineering fields.

  • Open Access

    Numerical Simulation Study of Built-In Porous Obstacles to Improve the Thermal Stratification Performance of Storage Tanks

    by Jun Tan, Shiping He, Zhenglong Du

    Thermocline storage tanks are critical components in energy storage systems for solar renewable energy utilization. The use of thermal stratification of the working fluid within the storage tank for energy storage is a pivotal technology in these systems. Effective thermal stratification can significantly enhance energy storage efficiency, meet a broader range of user demands, and improve the overall performance of the storage tank. Therefore, enhancing the energy storage efficiency of storage tanks is an essential objective. To promote internal temperature stratification within the tank, this study introduces a porous obstacle designed to improve the tank’s internal structure. A comparative analysis was conducted with tanks featuring different structural configurations. Using the commercial finite element software ANSYS, an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model was formulated to simulate the energy discharge process of five different tank structures under various operating conditions. By analyzing the internal temperature distribution, thermocline thickness, dimensionless exergy efficiency, and flow field trajectories, the stratification characteristics were determined. The results indicate that the porous obstacle significantly enhances stratification compared to the perforated plate obstacle. At a flow rate of 0.3 m/s, the thermocline thickness in traditional tanks and tanks with perforated plate obstacles is 42% and 14.3% greater, respectively, than in tanks with porous obstacles. Additionally, the study demonstrates that temperature stratification is more pronounced when the porous obstacle is positioned closer to the tank’s bottom, with the optimal configuration being the placement of porous obstacles near both the top and bottom of the tank. At a flow rate of 0.3 m/s, the thermocline thickness in tanks with porous obstacles only at the bottom and middle is 17% and 133% greater, respectively, than in tanks with porous obstacles at both the top and bottom.