Eric Y. Drogin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Eric Y. Drogin has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Richard Rogers
University of North Texas
2 shared publications - Barbara Burton
From Harvard Medical School; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
1 shared publication Donald J. Meyer
Harvard Medical School (Boston, MA, US)
1 shared publication- Gerald Young
Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, 2275 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON M4N 3M6, Canada
1 shared publication - Kamar Y. Tazi
Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, USA
1 shared publication - Laszlo A. Erdodi
Department of Psychology, University of Windsor
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 23 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Injury and Law
- Vol. 18 (3) , 185-198
Ethically Problematic Practices on Potential Traumas and Betrayals: Perspectives of Therapy Clients
- 23 May 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Injury and Law
- Vol. 18 (3) , 185-198
Ethically Problematic Practices on Potential Traumas and Betrayals: Perspectives of Therapy Clients
- 31 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Injury and Law
- Vol. 18 (1) , 71-83
Invalid Response Set, Malingering, and Related Assessments in Psychological Injury: Ethics, Causality, and Court
- 31 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Injury and Law
- Vol. 18 (1) , 71-83
Invalid Response Set, Malingering, and Related Assessments in Psychological Injury: Ethics, Causality, and Court
- 4 March 2021
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Harvard Review of Psychiatry
- Vol. 29 (3) , 234-239
Acquisition and Interpretation of Digital Information in Forensic Assessments
Despite the now ubiquitous presence of technology in everyday life, there is little written on the subject of personal digital data as it pertains to forensic mental health evaluations. Ethical concerns and limited consensus guidance on this issue have previously made it challenging to use this information in a responsible way. This Perspectives article elaborates on the different types of personal data that exist and the practical aspects of acquiring such information, including data location and legal considerations. Incorporation of personal digital information into the forensic assessment as a form of collateral information is discussed, along with the current state of the literature on technology use and its relationship to psychopathology and risk. Given the important role of technology in the life of the modern individual, deeper research into this topic will be necessary in the immediate future to establish practice standards for the safe and ethical use of digital information in both forensic and non-forensic mental health assessments.
- 4 March 2021
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Harvard Review of Psychiatry
- Vol. 29 (3) , 234-239
Acquisition and Interpretation of Digital Information in Forensic Assessments
Despite the now ubiquitous presence of technology in everyday life, there is little written on the subject of personal digital data as it pertains to forensic mental health evaluations. Ethical concerns and limited consensus guidance on this issue have previously made it challenging to use this information in a responsible way. This Perspectives article elaborates on the different types of personal data that exist and the practical aspects of acquiring such information, including data location and legal considerations. Incorporation of personal digital information into the forensic assessment as a form of collateral information is discussed, along with the current state of the literature on technology use and its relationship to psychopathology and risk. Given the important role of technology in the life of the modern individual, deeper research into this topic will be necessary in the immediate future to establish practice standards for the safe and ethical use of digital information in both forensic and non-forensic mental health assessments.