Simona Masia
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Simona Masia has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Piero Giustacchini
U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
2 shared publications - Alessandro Zuddas
Gastroenterology and GI Endoscopy Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, Qatar Foundation Endowment & Gemelli Foundation, Olbia, Italy
1 shared publication - Chiara Rocchi
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Mater Olbia Hospital, Sassari, Italy
1 shared publication - Giuseppe Marincola
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Guido Costamagna
Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Ica Bassu
Gastroenterology and GI Endoscopy Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, Qatar Foundation Endowment & Gemelli Foundation, Olbia, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 7 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Obesity Surgery
- Vol. 35 (9) , 3406-3413
Intragastric Balloon for Treatment of Overweight and Obesity: Which Is the Best Filling Volume? A Single-Center Randomized Study
Introduction Fluid-filled intragastric balloon (FF-IGB) placement is an endoscopic bariatric procedure that effectively achieves short-term weight loss in patients affected by obesity. Comparative data among different balloon volumes are lacking. This study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of FF-IGB at different volumes. Methods A randomized single-center analysis over 156 patients undergoing FF-IGB at a volume of 500 ml, 600 ml, or 700 ml with 6-month follow-up was conducted. Outcomes included postprocedural adverse events (AEs), early device removal for intolerance, evaluation of percentage of total weight loss (TWL%), excess weight loss (EWL%), and quality of life (QoL) at 6-month follow-up. Results The mean age of our cohort was 46.2 years, and 69.2% were female. The mean BMI was 41.9 kg/m2. Pain was the main adverse event being detected in 78.3% patients, followed by nausea (76.8%), and vomiting (50.7%). No serious AEs were reported. Ten patients required early balloon removal for epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. The FF-IGB volume was not associated with nausea (p = 0.657), vomiting (p = 0.487), pain (p = 0.182), or early removal (p = 0.988). Decrease in body mass index (BMI) after 6 months was significant (mean BMI 35.24 kg/m2, SD 7.17, p < 0.001). Mean TWL% after 6 months was 14.16. No significant difference between the FF-IGB volume and TWL% (p = 0.412) was detected. At 6 months follow-up, the mean EWL% was 30.8 ± 23.3 with no differences among the three groups of different FF-IGB volumes (p = 0.733). A significant improvement of QoL was detected at 6 months unrelated to the FF-IGB volume (p = 0.849). Conclusion FF-IGB placement resulted in significant weight loss over a 6-month period. No differences in TWL%, EWL%, rate of AEs, percentage of early device removal, and QoL were detected among the three groups with a different IGB volume. A 500 ml filling volume could be “the magic number” as no significant benefits are achieved with a greater volume. Key Points • Fluid-filled intragastric balloon (FF-IGB) placement effectively achieves short-term weight loss in patients affected by obesity, but comparative data among different balloon volumes are lacking. • Weight-loss outcomes, adverse-event rates, and quality-of-life gains were identical across 500 ml, 600 ml, and 700 ml balloon volumes. • A 500 ml filling volume for fluid-filled intragastric balloons could be “the magic number,” as larger volumes confer no additional benefit.
- 7 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Obesity Surgery
- Vol. 35 (9) , 3406-3413
Intragastric Balloon for Treatment of Overweight and Obesity: Which Is the Best Filling Volume? A Single-Center Randomized Study
Introduction Fluid-filled intragastric balloon (FF-IGB) placement is an endoscopic bariatric procedure that effectively achieves short-term weight loss in patients affected by obesity. Comparative data among different balloon volumes are lacking. This study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of FF-IGB at different volumes. Methods A randomized single-center analysis over 156 patients undergoing FF-IGB at a volume of 500 ml, 600 ml, or 700 ml with 6-month follow-up was conducted. Outcomes included postprocedural adverse events (AEs), early device removal for intolerance, evaluation of percentage of total weight loss (TWL%), excess weight loss (EWL%), and quality of life (QoL) at 6-month follow-up. Results The mean age of our cohort was 46.2 years, and 69.2% were female. The mean BMI was 41.9 kg/m2. Pain was the main adverse event being detected in 78.3% patients, followed by nausea (76.8%), and vomiting (50.7%). No serious AEs were reported. Ten patients required early balloon removal for epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. The FF-IGB volume was not associated with nausea (p = 0.657), vomiting (p = 0.487), pain (p = 0.182), or early removal (p = 0.988). Decrease in body mass index (BMI) after 6 months was significant (mean BMI 35.24 kg/m2, SD 7.17, p < 0.001). Mean TWL% after 6 months was 14.16. No significant difference between the FF-IGB volume and TWL% (p = 0.412) was detected. At 6 months follow-up, the mean EWL% was 30.8 ± 23.3 with no differences among the three groups of different FF-IGB volumes (p = 0.733). A significant improvement of QoL was detected at 6 months unrelated to the FF-IGB volume (p = 0.849). Conclusion FF-IGB placement resulted in significant weight loss over a 6-month period. No differences in TWL%, EWL%, rate of AEs, percentage of early device removal, and QoL were detected among the three groups with a different IGB volume. A 500 ml filling volume could be “the magic number” as no significant benefits are achieved with a greater volume. Key Points • Fluid-filled intragastric balloon (FF-IGB) placement effectively achieves short-term weight loss in patients affected by obesity, but comparative data among different balloon volumes are lacking. • Weight-loss outcomes, adverse-event rates, and quality-of-life gains were identical across 500 ml, 600 ml, and 700 ml balloon volumes. • A 500 ml filling volume for fluid-filled intragastric balloons could be “the magic number,” as larger volumes confer no additional benefit.
- 10 February 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Obesity Surgery
- Vol. 35 (3) , 685-693
Preoperative Body Composition Analysis as a Predictor of Weight Loss Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Bioelectrical Impedance Study
Background Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective intervention for severe obesity, but some patients may experience sub-optimal weight loss. This study investigates the role of preoperative body composition parameters, measured via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), in predicting postoperative weight loss outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 102 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) between January 2020 and April 2023. Preoperative body composition metrics, including fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), body cell mass (BCM), and phase angle (PhA), were correlated with percentages of excess weight loss (%EWL) and total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months post-surgery. Results The study found that patients with higher preoperative BCM and PhA showed significantly better weight loss outcomes. Specifically, patients with optimal weight loss had a mean BCM of 35.2 ± 3.5 kg and a PhA of 6.1 ± 0.5, whereas those with sub-optimal outcomes had a mean BCM of 29.8 ± 4.2 kg and a PhA of 4.9 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01 for both). Additionally, higher FM was associated with lower %EWL (r = − 0.40, p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified BCM (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.4) and %FM (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–0.9) as independent predictors of successful weight loss. Conclusions Preoperative BIA parameters, particularly BCM and %FM, are significantly associated with weight loss outcomes in BS patients. These findings suggest a potential role in guiding pre-surgical patient assessment and tailored care, while acknowledging that this relationship is correlational and not necessarily causal.
- 10 February 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Obesity Surgery
- Vol. 35 (3) , 685-693
Preoperative Body Composition Analysis as a Predictor of Weight Loss Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Bioelectrical Impedance Study
Background Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective intervention for severe obesity, but some patients may experience sub-optimal weight loss. This study investigates the role of preoperative body composition parameters, measured via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), in predicting postoperative weight loss outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 102 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) between January 2020 and April 2023. Preoperative body composition metrics, including fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), body cell mass (BCM), and phase angle (PhA), were correlated with percentages of excess weight loss (%EWL) and total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months post-surgery. Results The study found that patients with higher preoperative BCM and PhA showed significantly better weight loss outcomes. Specifically, patients with optimal weight loss had a mean BCM of 35.2 ± 3.5 kg and a PhA of 6.1 ± 0.5, whereas those with sub-optimal outcomes had a mean BCM of 29.8 ± 4.2 kg and a PhA of 4.9 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01 for both). Additionally, higher FM was associated with lower %EWL (r = − 0.40, p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified BCM (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.4) and %FM (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–0.9) as independent predictors of successful weight loss. Conclusions Preoperative BIA parameters, particularly BCM and %FM, are significantly associated with weight loss outcomes in BS patients. These findings suggest a potential role in guiding pre-surgical patient assessment and tailored care, while acknowledging that this relationship is correlational and not necessarily causal.