Tao Liu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Tao Liu has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Guanglin Chen
Department of Spinal Surgery, Weifang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China
1 shared publication - Guodong Sun
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord Reconstruction, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital (Heyuan Shenhe People's Hospital), Jinan University, Heyuan 517000, China; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Artificial Organs and Materials, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
1 shared publication Jianhao Sun
Department of Spinal Orthopedics, Weifang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, No. 1055, Weizhou Road, Kuiwen District, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China
1 shared publication- Jianhao Sun
Department of Internal Medicine, Weifang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang City, China
1 shared publication Miao Ge
Department of Spinal Orthopedics, Weifang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, No. 1055, Weizhou Road, Kuiwen District, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China
1 shared publicationNan Zhang
Department of Health Care, Weifang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 9 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
- Vol. 44 (3) , 277-287
Lactate and lactylation in osteoporosis: pathogenesis, regulation, and future perspectives
Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease characterized by bone microstructural degeneration and increased fracture risk, primarily driven by an imbalance in bone homeostasis. Recent studies have revealed that lactate metabolic remodeling and its derived lactylation modifications play a pivotal role in the dynamic balance between bone formation and resorption by regulating the metabolic-epigenetic network within the bone microenvironment. This review systematically examines the role of lactate metabolic pathways in the energy reprogramming of osteoblasts, analyzes the molecular mechanisms of lactylation in osteogenesis-osteoclastogenesis coupling, and discusses the challenges and future directions of novel therapeutic strategies targeting the lactate metabolism axis. By elucidating the critical role of lactate metabolism in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, this review aims to enhance comprehensive understanding and facilitate the development of effective therapeutic interventions.
- 9 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
- Vol. 44 (3) , 277-287
Lactate and lactylation in osteoporosis: pathogenesis, regulation, and future perspectives
Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease characterized by bone microstructural degeneration and increased fracture risk, primarily driven by an imbalance in bone homeostasis. Recent studies have revealed that lactate metabolic remodeling and its derived lactylation modifications play a pivotal role in the dynamic balance between bone formation and resorption by regulating the metabolic-epigenetic network within the bone microenvironment. This review systematically examines the role of lactate metabolic pathways in the energy reprogramming of osteoblasts, analyzes the molecular mechanisms of lactylation in osteogenesis-osteoclastogenesis coupling, and discusses the challenges and future directions of novel therapeutic strategies targeting the lactate metabolism axis. By elucidating the critical role of lactate metabolism in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, this review aims to enhance comprehensive understanding and facilitate the development of effective therapeutic interventions.
- Open Access
- 1 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurosurgical Review
- Vol. 48 (1) , 1-13
Comparative efficacy of one-hole split endoscope versus unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective analysis
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a prevalent spinal disorder affecting 20–40% of the population. This study compared the clinical efficacy of two minimally invasive techniques, one-hole split endoscopy (OSE) and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE), for treating single-level LDH. A retrospective analysis of 217 patients (OSE: 118; UBE: 99) treated between April 2021 and January 2025 demonstrated that while both techniques were effective, OSE offered several advantages. Incision lengths were shorter in the OSE group (2.20 ± 0.33 cm vs. 2.91 ± 0.33 cm; p < 0.001), and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy sessions were required (2.05 ± 0.21 vs. 2.59 ± 0.59; p < 0.001). Postoperative assessments revealed lower Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) scores (19.40 ± 2.81 vs. 20.87 ± 2.88; p = 0.003) and reduced visual analog scale(VAS) scores for low back pain (1.87 ± 0.68 vs. 2.24 ± 0.58; p = 0.002) in the OSE group at 7 days. The cross-sectional area of the multifidus muscle decreased less in OSE (104.71 ± 36.10) compared to UBE (268.85 ± 40.00; p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar, with no major adverse events such as infections or nerve injuries. The minimally invasive nature of OSE may contribute to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. Further large-scale, long-term studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess the long-term efficacy of OSE in spinal surgery. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
- 1 August 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurosurgical Review
- Vol. 48 (1) , 1-13
Open AccessComparative efficacy of one-hole split endoscope versus unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective analysis
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a prevalent spinal disorder affecting 20–40% of the population. This study compared the clinical efficacy of two minimally invasive techniques, one-hole split endoscopy (OSE) and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE), for treating single-level LDH. A retrospective analysis of 217 patients (OSE: 118; UBE: 99) treated between April 2021 and January 2025 demonstrated that while both techniques were effective, OSE offered several advantages. Incision lengths were shorter in the OSE group (2.20 ± 0.33 cm vs. 2.91 ± 0.33 cm; p < 0.001), and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy sessions were required (2.05 ± 0.21 vs. 2.59 ± 0.59; p < 0.001). Postoperative assessments revealed lower Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) scores (19.40 ± 2.81 vs. 20.87 ± 2.88; p = 0.003) and reduced visual analog scale(VAS) scores for low back pain (1.87 ± 0.68 vs. 2.24 ± 0.58; p = 0.002) in the OSE group at 7 days. The cross-sectional area of the multifidus muscle decreased less in OSE (104.71 ± 36.10) compared to UBE (268.85 ± 40.00; p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar, with no major adverse events such as infections or nerve injuries. The minimally invasive nature of OSE may contribute to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. Further large-scale, long-term studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess the long-term efficacy of OSE in spinal surgery. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.