AAAli Asadi

Ali Asadi

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Ali Asadi has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Integrated ore classification using stand-alone and hybridised machine learning algorithms

    by Ali Gholami Vijouyeh, Ali Kadkhodaie, Kamal Siahcheshm, Ali Asadi, Mohammadreza Hosseinzadeh

    A state-of-the-art, robust classification model using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms was developed in this study to estimate the gold ore classes based on trace elements measured by inductively coupled plasma (ICP). This approach involves the utilisation of stand-alone machine learning (ML) algorithms integrated within a committee machine (CM) framework. To this end, 19 trace elements including arsenic, bismuth, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, iron, mercury, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, tin, strontium, thorium, uranium and zinc acquired from eight drill holes in the Sari-Gunay gold-polymetallic mine (SGGM), Iran, were used as the inputs and three gold grade classes (ore, low-grade ore, and waste) were specified as outputs classes. The classes were defined based on their gold grades and mineable zones, using threshold values of > 1 g/t, 0.5-1 g/t, and < 0.5 g/t for ore, low-grade ore and waste, respectively. Eight stand-alone ML-based classifiers, including the back-propagation neural network (BP-NN), Takagi and Sugeno fuzzy inference system (TS-FIS), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), GentleBoost, LogitBoost, random under-sampling boosting (RUSBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) were used to perform the initial classification. The accuracy, precision and recall metrics were employed to evaluate the performance of the algorithms by comparing predicted results with reference data derived from ICP analysis and geological studies, providing a consistent reference benchmark. The parameters within each algorithm were tuned using the parameter-tuning method, aiming to identify the optimal model. The AdaBoost algorithm outperformed the other stand-alone algorithms. To further improve the stand-alone-derived classification outcomes and integrate the algorithms into a unified algorithm, genetic (GA) and simulated annealing (SA) optimisation algorithms were configured in the framework of the CM. Parameter-tuning of both optimisation algorithms produced multiple distinct models to determine the optimal weights and the best-performing model. The CM with SA (CMSA) outperformed the GA optimiser. Employing CMSA resulted in a 7.28% improvement in overall accuracy compared with the average performance of the stand-alone algorithms.

  • Open Access

    Mineralogical, geochemical, spectroscopic and isotopic investigation of hydrothermal chalcedony in Qazdez-Bahamarz District, Sarbisheh City, Eastern Iran

    by Ali Asadi, Mohammad Reza Hosseinzadeh, Vartan Simmonds, Yuanming Pan, Matthew I. Leybourne

    Chalcedony forms across a wide area in eastern Iran, particularly in the Sarbisheh district near Birjand city, with notable occurrences in the Qazdez-Bahamarz region. Here, cryptocrystalline quartz is found in hydrothermal veins and veinlets within volcanic rocks hosted by carbonate and intermediate igneous formations. Chalcedony samples of various colours—black, purple, green, blue, lavender, grey, lemon yellow and white—were analysed using diverse techniques. These chalcedony samples display fibrous and granular textures, comprising microcrystalline quartz, cryptocrystalline moganite, and opal-CT and opal-C interlayers. Elements that affect the colouration of chalcedony include iron (producing red and yellow tones), chromium (green), manganese (black, blue and grey patterns), nickel (purple) and copper (also purple). Altered carbonate host rocks are enriched in Fe, Cu, Zn and Cd, with Al and Mn depletion. Stable isotope analyses show δ 18 O values in agates range from +14.9‰ to +25.5‰, whereas δ 18 O and δ 13 C values in carbonate minerals and chalcedony range from +14.1‰ to +24.8‰ and –5.7‰ to +0.7‰, indicating agate formation from mantle-derived hydrothermal fluids mixed with meteoric waters. Raman spectroscopy detected moganite, α-quartz, goethite, aragonite and illite in agate interlayers. Analyses by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) revealed minerals of Fe, Cr, Ni, Ti and Sn. X-ray diffraction confirmed chalcedony, moganite and opal-CT, whereas EPR spectroscopy showed strong magnetic backgrounds from goethite and silicon-vacancy centres formed by radioactive decay of U, Th and their byproducts.