YZYingwei Zhu

Yingwei Zhu

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Yingwei Zhu has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Risk-Field Visualization and Path Planning for UAV Air Refueling Considering Wake Vortex Effects

    by Weijun Pan, Gaorui Xu, Chen Zhang, Leilei Deng, Yingwei Zhu, Yanqiang Jiang, Zhiyuan Dai

    Autonomous aerial refueling is a key technology for enhancing the endurance of unmanned aerial vehicles; however, the wingtip vortices generated by the tanker create a strong three-dimensional wake-vortex flow field, whose downwash and lateral airflow can impose significant rolling moments on the follower Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), posing a serious threat to flight safety. To address this issue, this study proposes an integrated framework that combines wake-vortex risk-field modeling with optimal path planning. The classical Hallock–Burnham (HB) model is first employed to predict vortex descent and lateral transport, while a two-phase model is used to characterize the temporal decay of vortex circulation. The predicted vortex parameters are then coupled with the UAV’s aerodynamic characteristics, and the rolling-moment coefficient (RMC) is introduced as a risk metric to compute its spatiotemporal distribution in three dimensions, thereby transforming the invisible wake-vortex disturbance into a visualizable and quantifiable dynamic three-dimensional risk map. On this basis, a wake-vortex-aware path-planning algorithm based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) is developed, incorporating adaptive weighting and elitist mutation strategies. A multi-objective cost function considering path length, safety, and smoothness is further constructed to search for an optimal safe path under wake-vortex influence. Simulation results indicate that, compared with the classical A* and Rapidly-Exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithms, the proposed method reduces cumulative risk exposure by approximately 90% and 75%, respectively, while limiting the increase in path length to about 8% (significantly lower than the increases of 40% for A* and 44% for RRT). In addition, the maximum turning angle is constrained within 10°, and the computation time remains around 0.052 s, satisfying real-time requirements. These results demonstrate that the proposed method can generate safe, efficient, and dynamically feasible paths for UAV aerial refueling and provide a valuable reference for wake-vortex avoidance in similar aerospace missions.

  • Open Access

    Theoretical Assessment of Runway Capacity for Training and Transport Airport Considering Wake Vortex Encounter Safety: A Case Study of Luoyang Beijiao Airport

    by Chen Zhang, Weijun Pan, Yingwei Zhu, Yanqiang Jiang, Xuan Wang

    Wake vortex is a critical factor affecting aircraft safety and airport runway capacity. To assess the runway capacity of mixed operations for training and transport airports, this study first simulated the wake vortex dissipation process of the commonly used A321 aircraft at Luoyang Beijiao Airport using a wake vortex prediction model. The SR20 training aircraft was selected as the subject for wake vortex encounters, with the rolling moment coefficient used as an indicator to assess the risk of wake encounters, and the wake vortex safety separation was calculated. Finally, a runway capacity model based on runway average service time for mixed training and transport operations was developed, calculating both runway landing capacity and the total runway capacity in the continuous landing and interleaved takeoff mode. The simulation results indicate that under different atmospheric BV frequencies, the safe wake vortex separations for the A321–SR20 combination are 6375 m, 6188 m, and 5700 m, respectively, representing reductions of 31.5%, 33.2%, and 38.4% shorter than the current CCAR-93TM-R6 regulatory separations, and compared to the RECAT 1.5 and RECAT-EU standards. Under reduced separation conditions, runway capacity demonstrated improvement across various atmospheric conditions and operational modes.