Larissa Rodrigues Turini
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Larissa Rodrigues Turini has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Cintia Machado de Oliveira
Federal Center of Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET/RJ, Rio de Janeiro 20271-204, Brazil
1 shared publication - Daduí Cordeiro Guerrieri
Postgraduate Program in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Technology (PPEMM), Celso Suckow da Fonseca Federal Center for Technology and Education (CEFET/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
1 shared publication - Joyce Azevedo Caetano
Transport Engineering Program COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-914, Brazil
1 shared publication - Leonardo Da Silva Ribeiro
Transport Engineering Program COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-914, Brazil
1 shared publication - Marina Leite de Barros Baltar
Transport Engineering Program COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-914, Brazil
1 shared publication - Rômulo Dante Orrico Filho
Transport Engineering Program COPPE/UFRJ, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-914, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 January 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Future Transportation
- Vol. 6 (1) , 28
Comparative Benchmarking Study of Leading International and Brazilian Metro Systems
Metro systems are high-capacity urban rail networks designed to provide fast, reliable, and efficient transportation. This article presents a comparative benchmarking study of six leading metro systems in Brazil and six prominent international cases, aiming to identify best practices and recurring challenges based on key operational, planning, design, governance, and performance indicators. The Brazilian systems analyzed are located in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Belo Horizonte, Fortaleza, Recife, and Salvador, while the international cases include London, Paris, Tokyo, Berlin, New York, and Madrid. The methodology combined documentary research with technical analysis of public data sources, institutional reports, and performance indicators. The results reveal significant contrasts in network scale, operational efficiency, governance models, funding mechanisms, and integration with urban planning. São Paulo’s system stands out for its network robustness, automation, and consolidated monitoring framework, while other Brazilian cities face limitations in service coverage and financial sustainability. The international cases offer valuable insights into fare integration, the use of emerging technologies, and the application of performance metrics to foster more sustainable and efficient high-capacity urban transit systems. The findings provide relevant evidence to support policymakers, transport authorities, and urban planners in improving the planning, management, and sustainability of high-capacity urban transit systems.
- 28 January 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Future Transportation
- Vol. 6 (1) , 28
Open AccessComparative Benchmarking Study of Leading International and Brazilian Metro Systems
Metro systems are high-capacity urban rail networks designed to provide fast, reliable, and efficient transportation. This article presents a comparative benchmarking study of six leading metro systems in Brazil and six prominent international cases, aiming to identify best practices and recurring challenges based on key operational, planning, design, governance, and performance indicators. The Brazilian systems analyzed are located in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Belo Horizonte, Fortaleza, Recife, and Salvador, while the international cases include London, Paris, Tokyo, Berlin, New York, and Madrid. The methodology combined documentary research with technical analysis of public data sources, institutional reports, and performance indicators. The results reveal significant contrasts in network scale, operational efficiency, governance models, funding mechanisms, and integration with urban planning. São Paulo’s system stands out for its network robustness, automation, and consolidated monitoring framework, while other Brazilian cities face limitations in service coverage and financial sustainability. The international cases offer valuable insights into fare integration, the use of emerging technologies, and the application of performance metrics to foster more sustainable and efficient high-capacity urban transit systems. The findings provide relevant evidence to support policymakers, transport authorities, and urban planners in improving the planning, management, and sustainability of high-capacity urban transit systems.