Caroline Mathias Carvalho de Souza
Research Subjects
Caroline Mathias Carvalho de Souza has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Caroline de Farias Charamba Leal
Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Recife 50100-130, PE, Brazil
1 shared publication - Helene Soares Moura
Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
1 shared publication - Julia Almeida Maciel da Silveira
Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Recife 50100-130, PE, Brazil
1 shared publication - Lorena Gomes Guimarães
Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Recife 50100-130, PE, Brazil
1 shared publication - Marcos Antonio Japiassú Resende Montes
Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Recife 50100-130, PE, Brazil
1 shared publication - Priscila Prosini
Dr. in Dentistry Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE) Pernambuco Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (3) , 1310
Efficacy of Resin Infiltrants in Non-Cavitated Occlusal Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of resin infiltrants (RIs) in controlling non-cavitated occlusal carious lesions (NCOCLs) in primary and permanent teeth. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and in vitro/ex vivo studies comparing RI with placebo or other materials were included. Searches were conducted in five databases and gray literature up to December 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool for RCT and an adapted instrument for in vitro/ex vivo studies. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE tool, and data were synthesized qualitatively. Results: Eight studies were included, of which only two were RCTs, and six were in vitro and ex vivo studies. RCTs showed reduced caries progression in infiltrant-treated groups compared with controls, with efficacy comparable to conventional sealants. In vitro studies demonstrated improved resin penetration and sealing ability with optimized protocols. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate. Certainty of clinical evidence was low, primarily due to the limited number of RCTs and methodological limitations. Conclusions: RIs may be effective in managing NCOCLs, with performance comparable to conventional preventive approaches. However, the limited number of clinical trials and short follow-up periods reduce the strength of the evidence. Long-term clinical studies are needed to confirm the sustained effectiveness and durability of RIs.
- 6 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 15 (3) , 1310
Open AccessEfficacy of Resin Infiltrants in Non-Cavitated Occlusal Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of resin infiltrants (RIs) in controlling non-cavitated occlusal carious lesions (NCOCLs) in primary and permanent teeth. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and in vitro/ex vivo studies comparing RI with placebo or other materials were included. Searches were conducted in five databases and gray literature up to December 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool for RCT and an adapted instrument for in vitro/ex vivo studies. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE tool, and data were synthesized qualitatively. Results: Eight studies were included, of which only two were RCTs, and six were in vitro and ex vivo studies. RCTs showed reduced caries progression in infiltrant-treated groups compared with controls, with efficacy comparable to conventional sealants. In vitro studies demonstrated improved resin penetration and sealing ability with optimized protocols. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate. Certainty of clinical evidence was low, primarily due to the limited number of RCTs and methodological limitations. Conclusions: RIs may be effective in managing NCOCLs, with performance comparable to conventional preventive approaches. However, the limited number of clinical trials and short follow-up periods reduce the strength of the evidence. Long-term clinical studies are needed to confirm the sustained effectiveness and durability of RIs.