Predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2- Brazilian Version for septic patients
Authors:
- Alldren Silva de SousaASAlldren Silva de Sousa
- Giovanna da Rosa SoaresGSGiovanna da Rosa Soares
- Jaqueline Pereira da CostaJCJaqueline Pereira da Costa
- Cristiano Rossa da RochaCRCristiano Rossa da Rocha
- Karina de Oliveira AzzolinKAKarina de Oliveira Azzolin
- Janete de Souza UrbanettoJUJanete de Souza Urbanetto
- Michelle Dornelles SantaremMSMichelle Dornelles Santarem
- Rita Catalina Aquino CaregnatoRCRita Catalina Aquino Caregnato
Open Access
- 1 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem
- Vol. 46, e20240233
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version, as compared to two other instruments for clinical deterioration, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital mortality of patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis admitted to an Emergency Service. Methods: Prospective cohort study conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 with 295 adult patients in a public hospital in southern Brazil. Data collection was performed using a specific instrument developed by the researchers, with two assessments at different times: at risk classification in emergency services, and as the patient was transferred to another service for the last time. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC, sensitivity, and specificity, comparing the scores across the evaluated outcomes and time points. Results: For clinical deterioration, the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version showed an AUC of 0.703, 95% CI (0.63-0.77), p<0.001, and an AUC of 0.871, 95% CI (0.82-0.91), p<0.001 in the first and second assessments, respectively. For admission to the Intensive Care Unit, all three scores remained accurate only in the second assessment, with the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version yielding the best results, AUC: 0.830, 95% CI (0.76-0.89), p<0.001 compared to the others. For in-hospital mortality, it presented an AUC of 0.770, 95% CI (0.70-0.83), p<0.001 in the second assessment. Conclusion: National Early Warning Score 2 - Versão Brasileira showed better predictive performance metrics compared to the other scores in the evaluated stages.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of comorbidities and COVID-19 on the evolution of community onset sepsisScientific Reports, 2023
- Prehospital qSOFA, mSOFA, and NEWS2 performance for sepsis prediction: A prospective, multi-center, cohort studyFrontiers in Medicine, 2023
- Prognostic value of serial score measurements of the national early warning score, the quick sequential organ failure assessment and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome to predict clinical outcome in early sepsisEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022
- A comparison of qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS in predicting the accuracy of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis: A meta-analysisPLOS ONE, 2022
- Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021Intensive Care Medicine, 2021
- Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency departmentInternal and Emergency Medicine, 2021
- Epidemiology, management and costs of sepsis in Spain (2008–2017): a retrospective multicentre studyCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2020
- Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease StudyThe Lancet, 2020
- Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care UnitAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017
- The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)JAMA, 2016