Gender Differences in the Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support
- 24 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 174, 20-26
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemodynamic Effects of Left Atrial or Left Ventricular Cannulation for Acute Circulatory Support in a Bovine Model of Left Heart InjuryASAIO Journal, 2015
- Trends in Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United StatesJournal of the American Heart Association, 2014
- Sex‐Based Differences in Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From TRANSLATE‐ACSJournal of the American Heart Association, 2014
- Timely Use of a CentriMag Heart Assist Device Improves Survival in Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic ShockJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 2011
- Implications and reasons for the lack of use of reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Findings from the CRUSADE initiativeAmerican Heart Journal, 2010
- In Normal Controls, Both Age and Gender Affect Coagulability as Measured by ThrombelastographyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2010
- Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2009
- Management of patients with heart failure in clinical practice: differences between men and womenHeart, 2008
- Sex Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis in a Broad Spectrum of Patients With Heart FailureCirculation, 2007
- Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromesJACC, 2005