A comparison between thin film solar cells made from co‐evaporated CuIn1‐xGaxSe2 using a one‐stage process versus a three‐stage process
Authors:
- Pedro M.P. SaloméPSPedro M.P. Salomé
- Joaquim P. LeitãoJoaquim P. Leitão
- Adam HultqvistAHAdam Hultqvist
- Paulo A. FernandesPFPaulo A. Fernandes
- Jennifer P. TeixeiraJTJennifer P. Teixeira
- Bruno P. FalcãoBruno P. Falcão
- Uwe ZimmermannUZUwe Zimmermann
- António F. da CunhaACAntónio F. da Cunha
- Marika EdoffMEMarika Edoff
- 4 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
- Vol. 23 (4) , 470-478
Abstract
Until this day, the most efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells have been prepared using a rather complex growth process often referred to as three‐stage or multistage. This family of processes is mainly characterized by a first step deposited with only In, Ga and Se flux to form a first layer. Cu is added in a second step until the film becomes slightly Cu‐rich, where‐after the film is converted to its final Cu‐poor composition by a third stage, again with no or very little addition of Cu. In this paper, a comparison between solar cells prepared with the three‐stage process and a one‐stage/in‐line process with the same composition, thickness, and solar cell stack is made. The one‐stage process is easier to be used in an industrial scale and do not have Cu‐rich transitions. The samples were analyzed using glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction, current–voltage‐temperature, capacitance‐voltage, external quantum efficiency, transmission/reflection, and photoluminescence. It was concluded that in spite of differences in the texturing, morphology and Ga gradient, the electrical performance of the two types of samples is quite similar as demonstrated by the similar J–V behavior, quantum spectral response, and the estimated recombination losses. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
Funding Information
- STandUP
- Funda��o para a Ci�ncia e Tecnologia (PEst-C/CTM/LA0025/2011)
- Funda��o para a Ci�ncia e Tecnologia (RECI/FIS-NAN/0183/2012)
- Swedish Energy Agency (�ngstr�m Thin Film Solar Center)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of high-efficiency CIGS integrated submodules using in-line deposition technologySolar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2011
- CIGS absorbers and processesProgress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2010
- Depth profiling of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films grown at low temperaturesSolar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2009
- 19·9%‐efficient ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 solar cell with 81·2% fill factorProgress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2008
- High quality baseline for high efficiency, Cu(In1−x,Gax)Se2 solar cellsProgress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2007
- The effect of Ga-grading in CIGS thin film solar cellsThin Solid Films, 2005
- Thin‐film solar cells: device measurements and analysisProgress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004
- Photogeneration and carrier recombination in graded gap Cu(In, Ga)Se/sub 2/ solar cellsIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2000
- Accelerated publication 16.4% total‐area conversion efficiency thin‐film polycrystalline MgF2/ZnO/CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2/Mo solar cellProgress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 1994
- Influence of deep traps on the measurement of free-carrier distributions in semiconductors by junction capacitance techniquesJournal of Applied Physics, 1974