34.1 A 65fsrms-Jitter and -272dB-FoMjitter,N 10.1GHz Fractional-N Digital PLL with a Quantization-Error-Compensating BBPD and an Orthogonal-Polynomial LMS Calibration
Authors:
- 16 February 2025
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Vol. 68, 554-556
Abstract
A digital PLL (DPLL) using a BBPD represents the optimal architecture for designing frequency synthesizers in a nanometer-scale CMOS technology because it minimizes reliance on analog circuits that require large headroom and numerous passive components. However, designing a fractional-N DPLL with low jitter, particularly at the sub-100fs level, is highly challenging due to the diverse quantization errors (Q-errors) that are inherent in digital circuits. To mitigate these Q-errors, various techniques have been proposed [1]–[5]. Recently, a common solution has involved using a digital-to-time converter (DTC) to eliminate the Q-error of the $\Delta\Sigma \mathrm{M}$ [6]–[13], which is the most dominant among various Q-errors. However, the DTC itself generates additional thermal noise that is proportional to the amount of delay [14], and this becomes another major source of in-band phase noise (PN). The DTC delay consists of a dynamic delay that is tunable to cancel the $\Delta \Sigma M$ Q-error and a static delay that is inevitably generated when producing the dynamic delay. To cover a wider range of the $\Delta\Sigma \mathrm{M}$ Q-error, the DTC must be designed with a larger dynamic delay range, and this also increases the static delay. A straightforward approach to reducing the thermal noise of the DTC is to use more power, but this inevitably degrades the overall jitter-power FoM $[\text{FoM}_{\text{iitter}}]$ of the DPLL. This dilemma underscores the need for a new design to cancel the $\Delta\Sigma M$ Q-error.
Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- 10.1 An 8.75GHz Fractional-N Digital PLL with a Reverse-Concavity Variable-Slope DTC Achieving 57.3fsrms Integrated Jitter and −252.4dB FoM2024
- 4.5 A 9.25GHz Digital PLL with Fractional-Spur Cancellation Based on a Multi-DTC Topology2023
- A 2.6-to-4.1GHz Fractional-N Digital PLL Based on a Time-Mode Arithmetic Unit Achieving -249.4dB FoM and -59dBc Fractional Spurs2022
- A 188fsrms-Jitter and −243d8-FoMjitter 5.2GHz-Ring-DCO-Based Fractional-N Digital PLL with a 1/8 DTC-Range-Reduction Technique Using a Quadruple-Timing-Margin Phase Selector2022
- 32.2 A 14nm Analog Sampling Fractional-N PLL with a Digital-to-Time Converter Range-Reduction Technique Achieving 80fs Integrated Jitter and 93fs at Near-Integer Channels2021
- 17.3 A −58dBc-Worst-Fractional-Spur and −234dB-FoMjitter, 5.5GHz Ring-DCO-Based Fractional-N DPLL Using a Time-Invariant-Probability Modulator, Generating a Nonlinearity-Robust DTC-Control Word2020
- A 0.98mW fractional-N ADPLL using 10b isolated constant-slope DTC with FOM of −246dB for IoT applications in 65nm CMOS2018
- 9.6 A 2.7-to-4.3GHz, 0.16psrms-jitter, −246.8dB-FOM, digital fractional-N sampling PLL in 28nm CMOS2016
- Phase Noise and Jitter in CMOS Ring OscillatorsIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2006
- Zur Theorie der linearen und nichtlinearen IntegralgleichungenMathematische Annalen, 1907