Rotationally Stable Screw-Anchor Versus Sliding Hip Screw Plate Systems in Stable Trochanteric Femur Fractures
Authors:
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
- Vol. 27 (6) , e127-e136
Abstract
Objectives: The rotationally stable screw-anchor plate system (RoSA) is unique in using a novel screw-blade combination. This investigation tested the hypothesis whether RoSA is advantageous over the sliding hip screw plate system (SHS) with regard to stiffness, failure load, displacement, and migration in stable trochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31A1.1). Methods: Thirteen femur pairs (mean age = 79 years; range, 64–92 years) received implants of either the RoSA or SHS (Koenigsee Implants, Allendorf, Germany). Beginning with 300 N and under consecutive 300 N load-increase steps (2000 cycles, 0.5 Hz) the femurs were cycled until failure. Specimens were evaluated for fragment displacement in both frontal and rotational planes and for migration. A survival analysis was carried out. Results: With regard to stiffness (526 ± 195 N/mm vs 358 ± 143 N/mm; P = 0.006) and the failure load (2838 ± 781 N vs 2262 ± 863 N; P = 0.012), the RoSA proved superior to the SHS. Furthermore, RoSA demonstrated higher rotational stability in comparison to the SHS (1800 N: 0 ± 0 degrees vs 1.1 ± 1.3 degrees; P = 0.015; failure point: 0 ± 0 degrees vs 2.3 ± 2.6 degrees; P = 0.008), measuring rotation about femoral neck axis over time. Whereas cutout occurred only in the RoSA system (n = 3; P = 0.110), the SHS underwent plastic deformation in 7 cases (n = 7; P = 0.003). In one case (7%), the insertion of the RoSA blade resulted in iatrogenic cut-through caused by a jamming of the screw and the blade. Conclusions: The fixation of stable trochanteric femur fractures with RoSA in cadavers led to greater primary stability under cyclic load, with significant advantages with regard to stiffness, failure load, and rotational stability, compared with the SHS. A detrimental effect was its migration tendency, which began at 1800 N and occurred in the cranial direction. A meticulous insertion technique was a prerequisite to avoid iatrogenic perforation of the femoral head. Our results will have to be substantiated by further biomechanical and clinical trials using an optimized RoSA system.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the rotation of the femural head a potential initiation for cutting out? A theoretical and experimental approachBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2011
- Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with posterior comminutionInternational Orthopaedics, 2011
- Hip screw migration testing: First results for hip screws and helical blades utilizing a new oscillating test methodJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2010
- Comparison of migration behavior between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixationJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2009
- The PFNA Proximal Femur Nail in Treatment of Unstable Proximal Femur Fractures-3 Cases of Postoperative Perforation of the Helical Blade Into the Hip JointJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2008
- Operationsergebnisse nach pertrochantärer Femurfraktur: Welchen Einfluss hat die Osteoporose? Vergleich zwischen DHS und perkutaner KompressionsplatteZeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, 2008
- Lag screws for hip fracture fixation: Evaluation of migration resistance under simulated walkingJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2005
- Bone Compaction Enhances Fixation of Weightbearing Titanium ImplantsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Intramedullary Fixation of Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip FracturesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2004
- A Biomechanical Analysis of the Sliding Hip ScrewJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1990