Community Acceptance of a Pediatric Prehospital Exception From Informed Consent Trial
- 12 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 33 (1) , e70212
Abstract
Background: Federal Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) regulations allow emergency care research without a priori consent under limited conditions by integrating feedback from community consultation and notification of communities through public disclosure (CC/PD) activities (21 CFR 50.24). Our objectives were to evaluate community acceptance of a pediatric emergency care trial using a commercial survey tool and to determine the characteristics associated with supportive respondents. Methods: The Pediatric Prehospital Airway Resuscitation Trial (Pedi‐PART) is an EFIC trial designed to compare pediatric prehospital airway management strategies. Pedi‐PART conducted community consultation/public disclosure (CC/PD) activities in March–April 2024. The CC/PD process used a commercial marketing research platform (Qualtrics Inc.) to provide study information and solicit feedback via an 18‐question survey. Participants indicated support for the study through three specific questions and provided demographic characteristics. We determined the predictors of trial approval among survey respondents. Results: A total of 6753 individuals completed surveys. The median age was 42 (IQR: 30–59) years, 62% were female, 13% were Black, and 15% were Hispanic. Survey respondents indicated support for conducting Pedi‐PART in their community as follows: 90% of males, 91% of females, 89% of Blacks, 92% of Hispanics, 92% of Whites, 90% of other race/ethnicities, and 93% of parents of a child < 18 years. Among respondents with less than a high school education, 84% approved of the study compared to 93% in those with a post‐graduate degree. Among those with an annual household income < $20,000, 85% approved of the study compared to 94% of those with an > $100,000 annual household income. In multivariable analysis, higher education and being the parent/guardian of a minor child were associated with support of the trial. Conclusions: Survey respondents largely supported the Pedi‐PART trial. Respondents who were parents or who had higher education were more likely to support the trial.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (4UH3HL165019)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1U24HL165014)
- Health Resources and Services Administration
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public support for and concerns regarding pediatric dose optimization for seizures in emergency medical services: An exception from informed consent (EFIC) trialAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2024
- Meeting unique requirements: Community consultation and public disclosure for research in emergency setting using exception from informed consentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2021
- Public Approval of Exception From Informed Consent in Emergency Clinical TrialsJAMA Network Open, 2019
- Does experience matter? Implications for community consultation for research in emergency settingsAJOB Empirical Bioethics, 2017
- Patients’ Perspectives of Enrollment in Research Without ConsentCritical Care Medicine, 2015
- Practical and Ethical Considerations for Using Social Media in Community Consultation and Public Disclosure ActivitiesAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2014
- Waiver of Informed Consent in Pediatric Resuscitation Research: A Systematic ReviewAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2013
- Community attitudes towards emergency research and exception from informed consentResuscitation, 2009
- Attitudes and beliefs of african americans toward participation in medical researchJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1999
- Informed Consent in Emergency ResearchJAMA, 1995