Analysis of the Positional Relationship Among the Operator, Camera, and Monitor: Overcoming the Difficulties of Mirror-image Conditions During Laparoscopic Surgery
Authors:
- Yuriko InagakiYIYuriko Inagaki
- Kazushige KawaiKKKazushige Kawai
- Takeshi NishikawaTNTakeshi Nishikawa
- Hiroaki IshiiHIHiroaki Ishii
- Shigenobu EmotoSEShigenobu Emoto
- Koji MuronoKMKoji Murono
- Manabu KanekoMKManabu Kaneko
- Kazuhito SasakiKSKazuhito Sasaki
- Hiroaki NozawaHNHiroaki Nozawa
- Soichiro IshiharaSISoichiro Ishihara
Open Access
- 23 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
- Vol. 31 (5) , 513-518
Abstract
Background: Although methods to overcome difficulties associated with mirror-image conditions have been investigated, the ideal spatial relationship among the operator line of sight, monitor location, and camera location remains unclear. Moreover, the best training method for improving laparoscopic surgical skills under varying operator line of sight, camera, and monitor positions is unknown. We aimed to investigate the role of laparoscopic training under mirror-image conditions in improving surgical efficiency and whether prior surgical experience affects such training. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Surgical Oncology, Tokyo University, Japan. Twenty-five surgeons participated. Novice (n=14), trained (n=7), and expert (n=4) participants performed the simulated task in a box trainer while varying the positional relationships among the surgeons, camera, and monitor. Five patterns were repeatedly performed 5 times per day for 4 days over 2 weeks. Results: The most significant differences in terms of the time required to complete the task under mirror-image conditions among the 3 groups were on day 1 (novices: 185.8 s, trained: 79.7 s, and experts: 46.5 s, P=0.009). However, after 4 days of training, the corresponding times did not differ among the 3 groups (26.0, 30.7, and 23.1 s, respectively; P=0.415). Laparoscopic training was sufficiently effective under mirror-image conditions. Conclusions: Mirror-image surgical conditions provided the most difficult setting, because surgeons and assistants often became disoriented, and task performance was most degraded. However, just 4 days of training was found to be sufficient to overcome the difficulties encountered while performing laparoscopic procedures under mirror-image conditions.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- A New Approach to Laparoscopic Lymph Node Excision in Cases of Transverse Colon CancerDigestion, 2012
- The impact of training under different visual-spatial conditions on reverse-alignment laparoscopic skills developmentSurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Image inversion and digital mirror-image technology aid laparoscopic surgery task performance in the paradoxical view: a randomized controlled trialSurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Learning curve of assistants in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: overcoming mirror imagingSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positionsSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Reverse-alignment surgical skills assessmentSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Comparison of orthodox versus off-optical axis endoscopic manipulationsSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Laparoscopic Segmental Resection of the Sigmoid Colon for EndometriosisJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1991