Assessing Perceptions Toward Aquatic Animal Welfare: A Study on the Perspectives of Educators, Students and Aquaculture Industry Stakeholders in South and South-Central Vietnam
Open Access
Abstract
This study investigated the perceptions of AAW among educators (n = 47), students (n = 359), and aquaculture sector stakeholders (n = 34) in key aquaculture regions of South and South-Central Vietnam. Using a mixed-methods survey, perception scores, understanding of core welfare concepts, curricular coverage, and willingness to pay (WTP) for higher-welfare products were assessed. Although perception scores were high across surveyed groups, only 5.57% of students identified most of the Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare, while 17.0% showed no understanding of welfare. This highlighted a gap between awareness and understanding, leading to the development of the Awareness Depth Gap Framework. A small but statistically significant negative correlation (Kendall–Theil –Sen slope = −0.28, p < 1.25 × 10−12) indicated that greater AAW curricular inclusion was associated with stronger welfare attitudes. Willingness to pay modest premiums (6–10%) for higher-welfare products increased non-linearly with higher perception scores among educators and students. In contrast, aquaculture sector stakeholders appeared to prioritise economic factors over welfare. These results highlight the need for structured AAW curricula and community collaborative education to close knowledge gaps. This study provides the first empirical insights into AAW perceptions across the education and aquaculture sectors in Vietnam.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- “Improving Farmed Fish Welfare in Asia” Project managed by the University of Stirling
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perspectives on the social sciences in global animal health governance: A qualitative study of expertsPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2025
- Consumers’ meat commitment and the importance of animal welfare as agricultural policy goalFood Quality and Preference, 2023
- Participatory action researchNature Reviews Methods Primers, 2023
- A longitudinal study of social, religious, and spiritual capital and physical and emotional functioning in a national sample of African–AmericansJournal of Community Psychology, 2022
- “Do you consider animal welfare to be important?” activating cognitive dissonance via value activation can promote vegetarian choicesJournal of Environmental Psychology, 2022
- Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.Psychological Methods, 2018
- A Systematic Review of Public Attitudes, Perceptions and Behaviours Towards Production Diseases Associated with Farm Animal WelfareJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2016
- Consumer liking and willingness to pay for high welfare animal-based productsTrends in Food Science & Technology, 2010
- Happy pigs are dirty! – conflicting perspectives on animal welfareLivestock Science, 2006
- Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfareAnimal Welfare, 2004